Threatened abortion, threatened premature labor, and preterm birth during the first state of emergency for COVID‐19 in 2020 in Japan.

Aim: This study examined the maternal experience of threatened abortion, threatened premature labor, or preterm birth before, during, and after the first state of emergency for COVID‐19 in 2020 in Japan. Methods: This was a cross‐sectional, internet‐based questionnaire survey. We recruited 600 postpartum women and divided them into three groups by date of delivery: before (October 2019–March 2020), during (April–May 2020), and after (June–October 2020) the first state of emergency. The outcome was the presence of at least one of the following complications: threatened abortion, threatened premature labor, and/or preterm birth. The prevalence ratios (PRs) of the outcome were calculated and compared among the three groups using a multivariable Poisson regression model with adjustment for potential confounders. Results: Of the 553 women eligible for analysis, those who delivered during (PR 0.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.47–0.99) and after (PR 0.62, 95% CI 0.42–0.90) the state of emergency were less likely to have experienced either threatened abortion, threatened premature labor, or preterm birth than those who delivered before the state of emergency. Among the adjustment variables, smoking at the time of survey (PR 1.68, 95% CI 1.01–2.80) and living in the prefectures with a population of >5 million (PR 0.71, 95% CI 0.51–0.97) were associated with the study outcome. Conclusion: Threatened abortion, threatened premature labor, or preterm birth appeared to decrease during and after the first state of emergency in 2020. The longitudinal effects of coronavirus disease on maternal and newborn health should be monitored continuously. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]