Back to Search Start Over

Objective air quality index versus subjective perception: which has a greater impact on life satisfaction?

Authors :
Shi, Xingmin
Li, Xueping
Chen, Xieyang
Zhang, Luping
Source :
Environment, Development & Sustainability; May2022, Vol. 24 Issue 5, p6860-6877, 18p
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Although the PM<subscript>2.5</subscript> concept was put forward in 1997, it came into Chinese people's sight in 2011, and became a household name in 2013 in China. Previous studies did not involve this indicator, so we need to re-examine and compare the effects of objective air quality data and subjective perception on Life satisfaction (LS). The data were collected from Xi'an, a megacity of Northwest China. Particles smaller than 2.5 μm in diameter (PM<subscript>2.5</subscript>), nitrogen dioxide (NO<subscript>2</subscript>), sulfur dioxide (SO<subscript>2</subscript>), and Air quality index (AQI) acquired from air quality stations were used to calculate pollutant concentrations near the vicinity of subjects' home by Geographical information system (GIS) software. In this paper, the ordinal logistic regression models are used to explain ratings of LS in terms of the objective air pollution data, social and economic variables. The results indicate that the objective air pollution data has significant and negative effects on LS of the surveyed respondents. However, when the subjective perception of air pollution is considered in the regression models, it shows that the subjective perception of air pollution has a significant negative impact on LS, while the effects of PM<subscript>2.5</subscript>, NO<subscript>2</subscript>, SO<subscript>2</subscript>, and AQI on the LS become insignificant. Furthermore, the research significances and policy suggestions are discussed in this paper. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1387585X
Volume :
24
Issue :
5
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Environment, Development & Sustainability
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
156495702
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01730-4