Assessments of multiple gridded‐rainfall datasets for characterizing the precipitation concentration index and its trends in India.

Rainfall is time concentric in nature. The spatial and temporal distribution of rainfall is changing over the Earth with recent anthropogenic warming. The study explores various characteristics of annual and seasonal concentration of rainfall across India using the precipitation concentration index (PCI) and its trends during the period of 1986–2015, based on a high‐resolution gauge‐based rainfall data (0.25 × 0.25°), obtained from the India Meteorological Department (IMD). An intercomparison is made with 11 other gridded rainfall datasets to infer whether these datasets can reasonably reproduce the spatiotemporal distribution of PCI and its trends in various homogenous rainfall regions of India or not. These datasets are categorized into gauge‐based (APHRODITE, GPCC, CPC), satellite‐derived (CHIRPS, PERSIANN‐CDR), and reanalysis (JRA‐55, MERRA‐2, NCEP‐2, PGF, ERA‐Interim, ERA‐5). On annual scale, about 8.52, 24.1, and 67.38% of area of India are under moderate, irregular, and strongly irregular rainfall distribution, respectively. Spatial variation of PCI in India is influenced by geographical factors such as latitude, longitude, and elevation. Significant increasing and decreasing trends in annual PCI have been observed in the northeast, eastern, and western coasts of India, respectively. Gridded data intercomparison suggests that the gauge‐based APHRODITE, GPCC, and satellite‐derived CHIRPS datasets better perform in capturing the temporal and spatial variation of PCI across India when compared to the IMD gridded dataset, whereas the ERA‐5 performs better among the reanalysis datasets. However, the rainfall datasets exhibited marked differences with the IMD while estimating the annual and seasonal trend and its magnitude across various regions of India. The JRA‐55 overestimated areas of positive trend and its magnitude on annual and seasonal scale. These findings have practical implications for hydroclimatic studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]