Back to Search Start Over

Comprehensive assessment of extraction methods for plant tissue samples for determining sodium and potassium via flame photometer and chloride via automated flow analysis#.

Authors :
Asch, Julia
Johnson, Kristian
Mondal, Shimul
Asch, Folkard
Source :
Journal of Plant Nutrition & Soil Science; Apr2022, Vol. 185 Issue 2, p308-316, 9p
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Background and aims: Determination of sodium (Na), potassium (K), and chloride (Cl) content in plant tissue is required for research related to salinity resistance in plants. Standard methods are available to extract these elements from dried plant material, but these methods are often costly, relatively dangerous, or time consuming. Many authors modify extraction methods substantially without proof of comparability across methods. Methods: Here, dried tissues of two varieties of rice and three varieties of sweet potato subjected to salt stress were extracted for Na and K using six different extraction methods (1–6) and for Cl using three Cl‐free extraction methods (2, 4, 5) for Cl: (1) the VDLUFA standard method, consisting of ashing, and heat extraction in hydrochloric acid (HCl), (2) hot water pressure extraction via autoclave, (3) extraction with 1 M HCl overnight, (4) hot water extraction at 90°C for 1 h, (5) acetic acid extraction in hot 1 M acetic acid for 2 h, and (6) extraction with a microwave using nitric acid. Na and K were determined via flame photometer and Cl via automated flow analysis. Results: Na and K concentrations varied little among different extraction methods as compared to the VDLUFA standard method, and for Cl, all extractions resulted in similar tissue Cl concentrations. Conclusions: Ultimately, the choice of extraction method depends on the instrumentation and lab equipment necessary, available budget, the available amount of sample, and time constraints which should be decided according to the experiment. For reasons of comparability among publications, methods applied should be clearly described since results vary depending on the method chosen. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14368730
Volume :
185
Issue :
2
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Journal of Plant Nutrition & Soil Science
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
156113718
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.202100344