Back to Search Start Over

Interactions of a didomain fragment of the Drosophila Sex-lethal protein with single-stranded uridine-rich oligoribonucleotides derived from the transformer and Sex-lethal messenger RNA precursors: NMR with residue-selective [5-2H]uridine substitutions.

Authors :
Kim, Insil
Muto, Yutaka
Watanabe, Satoru
Kitamura, Aya
Futamura, Yasuhiro
Yokoyama, Shigeyuki
Hosono, Kazumi
Kawai, Gota
Takaku, Hiroshi
Dohmae, Naoshi
Takio, Koji
Sakamoto, Hiroshi
Shimura, Yoshiro
Source :
Journal of Biomolecular NMR; Jun2000, Vol. 17 Issue 2, p153-165, 13p
Publication Year :
2000

Abstract

Proteins that contain two or more copies of the RNA-binding domain [ribonucleoprotein (RNP) domain or RNA recognition motif (RRM)] are considered to be involved in the recognition of single-stranded RNA, but the mechanisms of this recognition are poorly understood at the molecular level. For an NMR analysis of a single-stranded RNA complexed with a multi-RBD protein, residue-selective stable-isotope labeling techniques are necessary, rather than common assignment methods based on the secondary structure of RNA. In the present study, we analyzed the interaction of a Drosophila Sex-lethal (Sxl) protein fragment, consisting of two RBDs (RBD1–RBD2), with two distinct target RNAs derived from the tra and Sxl mRNA precursors with guanosine and adenosine, respectively, in a position near the 5′-terminus of a uridine stretch. First, we prepared a [5-<superscript>2</superscript>H]uridine phosphoramidite, and synthesized a series of <superscript>2</superscript>H-labeled RNAs, in which all of the uridine residues except one were replaced by [5-<superscript>2</superscript>H]uridine in the target sequence, GU<subscript>8</subscript>C. By observing the H5-H6 TOCSY cross peaks of the series of <superscript>2</superscript>H-labeled RNAs complexed with the Sxl RBD1–RBD2, all of the base H5-H6 proton resonances of the target RNA were unambiguously assigned. Then, the H5-H6 cross peaks of other target RNAs, GU<subscript>2</subscript>GU<subscript>8</subscript>, AU<subscript>8</subscript>, and UAU<subscript>8</subscript>, were assigned by comparison with those of GU<subscript>8</subscript>C. We found that the uridine residue prior to the G or A residue is essential for proper interaction with the protein, and that the interaction is tighter for A than for G. Moreover, the H1′ resonance assignments were achieved from the H5-H6 assignments. The results revealed that all of the protein-bound nucleotide residues, except for only two, are in the unusual C2′-endo ribose conformation in the complex. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09252738
Volume :
17
Issue :
2
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Journal of Biomolecular NMR
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
15608502
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008357028116