Back to Search Start Over

Prevalence of Individuals With Deafblindness and Age-Related Dual-Sensory Loss.

Authors :
Minhas, Renu
Jaiswal, Atul
Chan, Serena
Trevisan, Jessica
Paramasivam, Abinethaa
Spruyt-Rocks, Roxanna
Source :
Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness; Jan2022, Vol. 116 Issue 1, p36-47, 12p
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Introduction: The authors of this paper have compiled a report on the prevalence of deafblindness and dual-sensory loss based on the review of existing estimates. The purpose is to inform readers of the importance of using consistent, well-researched definitions and survey questions in future prevalence studies. Methods: Articles were extracted through ProQuest and EBSCOhost, online library databases of Cambrian College and Laurentian University. Keywords search included "deafblindness," "dual-sensory impairment," "dual-sensory loss," "age-related," "congenital," "acquired," and "prevalence." Additionally, the authors conducted a search with Google for research reports and Google Scholar for other relevant peer-reviewed articles. Results: This review provides a current overview of prevalence estimates of deafblindness and age-related dual-sensory loss around the world, examining 19 articles or reports published over the last 20 years (2000–2020) in 18 countries, including the European Union (consisting of 8 countries). In line with the prevalence estimates by the World Federation for the Deafblind global report 2018, the review indicates an estimated 0.2–2% prevalence of dual-sensory impairment and underscores varying ranges of prevalence among populations, studies or countries, age groups, and types of deafblindness. The review highlights that the prevalence of deafblindness or dual-sensory loss was often not comparable across studies, but it is clear that the prevalence of dual-sensory impairment increases with age. The studies varied in methods (e.g., population surveys, cross-sectional, and longitudinal studies). Implication for Practitioners: The review provides evidence of varying ranges of prevalence rates. Future prevalence studies may benefit from consistent definitions, standard data-collection tools to do better comparisons across countries, and identify factors that predict higher or lower prevalence rates among populations and age groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0145482X
Volume :
116
Issue :
1
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
155892129
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X211072541