Time–temperature indicators versus temperature indicators for transfusion practice: Application in the real hospital setting.

Background and Objectives: Temperature indicators (TIs) are used to monitor the surface temperature of red blood cell (RBC) units. We compared the utility of a newly developed time–temperature indicator (TTI) prototype, Freshzone TTI (FZTTI) (Freshzone, Seoul, South Korea) and two US Food and Drug Administration–approved TIs, Safe‐T‐Vue 10 (STV10; Temptime Corporation, Morris Plains, NJ) and Blood Temp 10 (BT10; Timestrip UK Ltd, Cambridge, UK). Materials and Methods: FZTTI, STV10 and BT10 were attached to 91 RBC units after issue (including eight units that were stored in refrigerators in the ward before transfusion). The time for colour change (CC) was monitored based on the 30‐min rule. The CC of FZTTI indicated the total time elapsed since the temperature of RBC units exceeded 10°C, and the CC of STV10 and BT10 indicated that the temperature of RBC units exceeded 10°C. Results: In 83 units, the median time for CC differed significantly between FZTTI and the TIs (51.4 min in FZTTI vs. 13.9 min in STV10 and 10.5 min in BT10, both at p < 0.001). In addition, 95.2% (n = 79) of FZTTI tags changed colour after 30 min of issue, whereas 96.4% (n = 80) of STV10 and 98.8% (n = 82) of BT10 changed colour within 30 min of issue. In the eight units stored in refrigerators, the time for CC between the TTI and TIs was significantly different. Conclusion: FZTTI outperformed the TIs, indicating that it is a feasible option for use in transfusion practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]