Back to Search Start Over

The importance of hydrology in routing terrestrial carbon to the atmosphere via global streams and rivers.

Authors :
Shaoda Liu
Kuhn, Catherine
Amatulli, Giuseppe
Aho, Kelly
Butman, David E.
Allen, George H.
Peirong Lin
Ming Pan
Dai Yamazaki
Brinkerhoff, Craig
Gleason, Colin
Xinghui Xia
Raymond, Peter A.
Source :
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America; 3/15/2022, Vol. 119 Issue 11, p1-9, 59p
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

The magnitude of stream and river carbon dioxide (CO2) emission is affected by seasonal changes in watershed biogeochemistry and hydrology. Global estimates of this flux are, however, uncertain, relying on calculated values for CO2 and lacking spatial accuracy or seasonal variations critical for understanding macroecosystem controls of the flux. Here, we compiled 5,910 direct measurements of fluvial CO2 partial pressure and modeled them against watershed properties to resolve reach-scale monthly variations of the flux. The direct measurements were then combined with seasonally resolved gas transfer velocity and river surface area estimates from a recent global hydrography dataset to constrain the flux at the monthly scale. Globally, fluvial CO2 emission varies between 112 and 209 Tg of carbon per month. The monthly flux varies much more in Arctic and northern temperate rivers than in tropical and southern temperate rivers (coefficient of variation: 46 to 95 vs. 6 to 12%). Annual fluvial CO2 emission to terrestrial gross primary production (GPP) ratio is highly variable across regions, ranging from negligible (<0.2%) to 18%. Nonlinear regressions suggest a saturating increase in GPP and a nonsaturating, steeper increase in fluvial CO2 emission with discharge across regions, which leads to higher percentages of GPP being shunted into rivers for evasion in wetter regions. This highlights the importance of hydrology, in particular water throughput, in routing terrestrial carbon to the atmosphere via the global drainage networks. Our results suggest the need to account for the differential hydrological responses of terrestrial-atmospheric vs. fluvial-atmospheric carbon exchanges in plumbing the terrestrial carbon budget. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00278424
Volume :
119
Issue :
11
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
155803902
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2106322119