Back to Search Start Over

Application of the Meet-URO score to metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients treated with second- and third-line cabozantinib.

Authors :
Rebuzzi, Sara Elena
Cerbone, Luigi
Signori, Alessio
Santoni, Matteo
Murianni, Veronica
De Giorgi, Ugo
Procopio, Giuseppe
Porta, Camillo
Milella, Michele
Basso, Umberto
Massari, Francesco
Maruzzo, Marco
Iacovelli, Roberto
Battelli, Nicola
Carmisciano, Luca
Banna, Giuseppe Luigi
Buti, Sebastiano
Fornarini, Giuseppe
Source :
Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology; 2/26/2022, p1-12, 12p
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Background: The addition of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and bone metastases to the International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) score (by the Meet-URO score) has been shown to better stratify pretreated metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients receiving nivolumab. This study aimed to validate the Meet-URO score in patients receiving cabozantinib to assess its predictivity and prognostic role. Methods: A multicenter retrospective analysis evaluated mRCC patients receiving ⩾second-line cabozantinib. NLR, IMDC score and bone metastases were assessed before the start of cabozantinib. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Harrell's c -index was calculated to compare the accuracy of the prediction of the two scores. Results: Overall, 174 mRCC patients received cabozantinib as second and third line (51.7% and 48.3%, respectively) with a median follow-up of 6.8 months. A shorter median overall survival (mOS) was observed for the IMDC poor-risk group, NLR ⩾3.2 and the presence of bone metastases, while the IMDC intermediate-risk group had a similar mOS to the favourable-risk one. Applying the Meet-URO score, three risk groups were identified: group 1 (55.2% of patients) with a score of 0–3, group 2 (38.5%) with a score of 4–8 and group 3 (6.3%) with a score of 9. Compared to group 1 (mOS: 39.4 months), a statistically significant worse mOS was observed in group 2 (11.2 months) and group 3 (3.2 months) patients, respectively. The Meet-URO c -index score was 0.640, showing a higher discriminative ability than the IMDC score (c -index: 0.568). Conclusion: This analysis showed that the Meet-URO score provides a more accurate prognostic stratification than the IMDC score in mRCC patients treated with ⩾second-line cabozantinib besides nivolumab. Moreover, it is an easy-to-use tool with no additional costs for clinical practice (web-calculator is available at: https://proviso.shinyapps.io/Meet-URO15%5fscore/). Future investigations will include the application of the Meet-URO score to the first-line immunotherapy-based combination therapies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
17588340
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
155438004
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1177/17588359221079580