Back to Search Start Over

iSelf-Help: a co-designed, culturally appropriate, online pain management programme in Aotearoa.

Authors :
Perry, Meredith A.
Devan, Hemakumar
Davies, Cheryl
Hempel, Dagmar
Ingham, Tristram
Jones, Bernadette
Reid, Susan
Saipe, Barbara
Patient Advisory Group members
Godfrey, Hazel
Snaddon, Natalie
Morris, Lily
Puha, Nadine
Haines, Bronwyn
Irving, Alanna
Brenycz, Matthew
Technology Design Team
Fa'atafa, Paulien
Maclean, Kaylee
Bulfin, Siobhan
Source :
Research Involvement & Engagement; 2/22/2022, Vol. 8 Issue 1, p1-15, 15p
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Introduction: Current best practice recommends group-based pain management programmes for long-term improvements in persistent pain-related disability. However, there are barriers for people to access in-person delivered pain management programmes in Aotearoa. Aims: To develop a co-designed, culturally responsive, online group-based pain management programme (iSelf-help) for people with persistent pain. Methods: A modified participatory action research (PAR) framework was used to co-design contents and cultural-appropriateness of iSelf-help. The PAR team included: (1) seven end-users living with persistent pain, who had previously attended an in-person delivered group pain management programme, (2) two pain management clinicians, (3) two health researchers, (4) two digital health experts, and (5) a health literacy expert. Five meetings were held with the PAR group and a Nominal Group Technique was used to rank order the preferred features of content delivery. In parallel, to ensure cultural appropriateness of iSelf-help, three focus groups (n = 15) were held with Māori (the Indigenous population of Aotearoa) living with persistent pain in collaboration with a Māori community health trust. All contents were reviewed by a Māori Health literacy expert and core contents were translated into Te Reo (Māori language). All contents were finalised by iterative discussion among the PAR team and consultation with Māori stakeholders. The preliminary version of iSelf-help was pilot tested with the PAR group participants and Māori community members living with persistent pain and their feedback was included. The iterative co-design process occurred over a period of nine months. Results: The finalised version of iSelf-help included a total of 130 resources organised in to 12 content relevant online modules plus a dedicated welcoming page and an online community forum. Each module included: short videos, animations explaining main concepts, patient stories, written content to accompany visual content, podcasts of relaxation techniques, illustrated texts, and evidence-summaries. A dedicated module of videos demonstrating cardiovascular and strengthening exercises of varying intensity was also included. Conclusions: This is the first co-created, culturally appropriate, on-line group pain management programme for people with persistent pain, developed in Aotearoa. The next step is to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of iSelf-help compared to in-person delivered pain management programme. Plain English summary: Pain management programmes delivered in a group format are best practice to support people living with persistent non-cancer pain to live well. Some people can find accessing these programmes hard due to lack of referral, transportation costs and lack of trained health professionals. Further, people from Indigenous and non-Western backgrounds are poorly represented in these programmes despite having a high prevalence of persistent pain. One way of improving access is delivering services via technology. We aimed to co-design an online version of an existing hospital-based pain management programme (iSelf-help) and to ensure cultural appropriateness of the iSelf-help for Māori. Māori are the Indigenous population of Aotearoa (an accepted Māori word to describe New Zealand). We used a modified participatory action research (PAR) framework for our co-design process. This framework actively encouraged people with lived experience of pain and community partners to have a voice in the content design. The PAR team included: (1) seven end-users living with persistent pain, who had previously attended hospital-based pain management programme, (2) two pain management clinicians, (3) two health researchers, (4) two digital health experts, and (5) a health literacy expert. Five meetings were held with the PAR team. We used a Nominal Group Technique, whereby PAR team members ranked their preferences on content design and delivery, until concensus was reached. In parallel, three focus groups (n = 15) were held with Māori living with persistent pain in collaboration with a Māori community health trust. All contents were reviewed by a Māori Health literacy expert and core contents were translated into Te Reo (Māori language). The finalised version of iSelf-help included 130 resources, tested for accessibility, organised in to 12 online modules plus a dedicated welcoming page and an online community forum. Each module included: short videos, animations, patient stories, podcasts of relaxation techniques, illustrated texts, and evidence-summaries. This is the first co-created, culturally appropriate, on-line group pain management programme for people with persistent pain, developed in Aotearoa. We are currently evaluating if iSelf-help is acceptable to users, and clinically and cost effective as compared to the hospital-based pain management programme. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20567529
Volume :
8
Issue :
1
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Research Involvement & Engagement
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
155379024
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-022-00339-9