Back to Search Start Over

Mobility endpoints in marketing authorisation of drugs: what gets the European medicines agency moving?

Authors :
Jaeger, Simon U
Wohlrab, Martin
Schoene, Daniel
Tremmel, Roman
Chambers, Michael
Leocani, Letizia
Corriol-Rohou, Solange
Klenk, Jochen
Sharrack, Basil
Garcia-Aymerich, Judith
Rochester, Lynn
Maetzler, Walter
Puhan, Milo
Schwab, Matthias
Becker, Clemens
Source :
Age & Ageing; Jan2022, Vol. 51 Issue 1, p1-10, 10p, 1 Diagram, 2 Charts, 2 Graphs
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Background Mobility is defined as the ability to independently move around the environment and is a key contributor to quality of life, especially in older age. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of mobility as a decisive outcome for the marketing authorisation of drugs by the European Medicines Agency (EMA). Methods Fifteen therapeutic areas which commonly lead to relevant mobility impairments and alter the quantity and/or the quality of walking were selected: two systemic neurological diseases, four conditions primarily affecting exercise capacity, seven musculoskeletal diseases and two conditions representing sensory impairments. European Public Assessment Reports (EPARs) published by the EMA until September 2020 were examined for mobility endpoints included in their 'main studies'. Clinical study registries and primary scientific publications for these studies were also reviewed. Results Four hundred and eighty-four EPARs yielded 186 relevant documents with 402 'main studies'. The EPARs reported 153 primary and 584 secondary endpoints which considered mobility; 70 different assessment tools (38 patient-reported outcomes, 13 clinician-reported outcomes, 8 performance outcomes and 13 composite endpoints) were used. Only 15.7% of those tools distinctly informed on patients' mobility status. Out of 402, 105 (26.1%) of the 'main studies' did not have any mobility assessment. Furthermore, none of these studies included a digital mobility outcome. Conclusions For conditions with a high impact on mobility, mobility assessment was given little consideration in the marketing authorisation of drugs by the EMA. Where mobility impairment was considered to be a relevant outcome, questionnaires or composite scores susceptible to reporting biases were predominantly used. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00020729
Volume :
51
Issue :
1
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Age & Ageing
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
155241255
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afab242