ICONIC study-conservative versus conventional oxygenation targets in intensive care patients: study protocol for a randomized clinical trial.

MLA

Grim, C. C. A., et al. “ICONIC Study-Conservative versus Conventional Oxygenation Targets in Intensive Care Patients: Study Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial.” Trials, vol. 23, no. 1, Feb. 2022, pp. 1–12. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06065-7.

APA

Grim, C. C. A., van der Wal, L. I., Helmerhorst, H. J. F., van Westerloo, D. J., Pelosi, P., Schultz, M. J., de Jonge, E., for the ICONIC Investigators and PROVE Network, del Prado, M. R., Wigbers, J., Sigtermans, M. J., Dawson, L., van der Heijden, P. L. J., den Berg, E. Y. S., Loef, B. G., Reidinga, A. C., de Vreede, E., Qualm, J., Boerma, E. C., & Rijnhart-de Jong, H. (2022). ICONIC study-conservative versus conventional oxygenation targets in intensive care patients: study protocol for a randomized clinical trial. Trials, 23(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06065-7

Chicago

Grim, C. C. A., L. I. van der Wal, H. J. F. Helmerhorst, D. J. van Westerloo, P. Pelosi, M. J. Schultz, E. de Jonge, et al. 2022. “ICONIC Study-Conservative versus Conventional Oxygenation Targets in Intensive Care Patients: Study Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial.” Trials 23 (1): 1–12. doi:10.1186/s13063-022-06065-7.