Back to Search Start Over

Target coverage and local recurrences after radiotherapy for sinonasal cancer in Denmark 2008–2015. A DAHANCA study.

Authors :
Sharma, Maja B.
Jensen, Kenneth
Friborg, Jeppe
Smulders, Bob
Andersen, Elo
Samsøe, Eva
Johansen, Jørgen
Hansen, Christian R.
Andersen, Maria
Nielsen, Martin S.
Filtenborg, Mads V.
Ren, Jintao
Korreman, Stine S.
Overgaard, Jens
Grau, Cai
Source :
Acta Oncologica; Feb 2022, Vol. 61 Issue 2, p120-126, 7p, 1 Black and White Photograph, 3 Charts, 1 Graph
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

The study aimed to investigate the pattern of failure and describe compromises in the definition and coverage of the target for patients treated with curatively intended radiotherapy (RT) for sinonasal cancer (SNC). Patients treated with curatively intended RT in 2008–2015 in Denmark for SNC were eligible for the retrospective cohort study. Information regarding diagnosis and treatment was retrieved from the national database of the Danish Head and Neck Cancer Group (DAHANCA). Imaging from the diagnosis of recurrences was collected, and the point of origin (PO) of the recurrent tumour was estimated. All treatment plans were collected and reviewed with the focus on target coverage, manual modifications of target volumes, and dose to organs at risk (OARs) above defined constraints. A total of 184 patients were included in the analysis, and 76 (41%) relapsed. The majority of recurrences involved T-site (76%). Recurrence imaging of 39 patients was evaluated, and PO was established. Twenty-nine POs (74%) were located within the CTV, and the minimum dose to the PO was median 64.1 Gy (3.1–70.7). The criteria for target coverage (V95%) was not met in 89/184 (48%) of the CTV and 131/184 (71%) of the PTV. A total of 24% of CTVs had been manually modified to spare OARs of high-dose irradiation. No difference in target volume modifications was observed between patients who suffered recurrence and patients with lasting remission. The majority of relapses after radical treatment of SNC were located in the T-site (the primary tumour site). Multiple compromises with regards to target coverage and tolerance levels for OARs in the sinonasal region, as defined from RT guidelines, were taken. No common practice in this respect could be derived from the study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0284186X
Volume :
61
Issue :
2
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Acta Oncologica
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
155083614
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1080/0284186X.2021.2022199