Back to Search Start Over

Deep learning-assisted PET imaging achieves fast scan/low-dose examination.

Authors :
Xing, Yan
Qiao, Wenli
Wang, Taisong
Wang, Ying
Li, Chenwei
Lv, Yang
Xi, Chen
Liao, Shu
Qian, Zheng
Zhao, Jinhua
Source :
EJNMMI Physics; 2/4/2022, Vol. 9 Issue 1, p1-17, 17p
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the impact of a deep learning (DL)-based denoising method on the image quality and lesion detectability of <superscript>18</superscript>F-FDG positron emission tomography (PET) images. Methods: Fifty-two oncological patients undergoing an <superscript>18</superscript>F-FDG PET/CT imaging with an acquisition of 180 s per bed position were retrospectively included. The list-mode data were rebinned into four datasets: 100% (reference), 75%, 50%, and 33.3% of the total counts, and then reconstructed by OSEM algorithm and post-processed with the DL and Gaussian filter (GS). The image quality was assessed using a 5-point Likert scale, and FDG-avid lesions were counted to measure lesion detectability. Standardized uptake values (SUVs) in livers and lesions, liver signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and target-to-background ratio (TBR) values were compared between the methods. Subgroup analyses compared TBRs after categorizing lesions based on parameters like lesion diameter, uptake or patient habitus. Results: The DL method showed superior performance regarding image noise and inferior performance regarding lesion contrast in the qualitative assessment. More than 96.8% of the lesions were successfully identified in DL images. Excellent agreements on SUV in livers and lesions were found. The DL method significantly improved the liver SNR for count reduction down to 33.3% (p < 0.001). Lesion TBR was not significantly different between DL and reference images of the 75% dataset; furthermore, there was no significant difference either for lesions of > 10 mm or lesions in BMIs of > 25. For the 50% dataset, there was no significant difference between DL and reference images for TBR of lesion with > 15 mm or higher uptake than liver. Conclusions: The developed DL method improved both liver SNR and lesion TBR indicating better image quality and lesion conspicuousness compared to GS method. Compared with the reference, it showed non-inferior image quality with reduced counts by 25–50% under various conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
21977364
Volume :
9
Issue :
1
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
EJNMMI Physics
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
155080078
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40658-022-00431-9