Back to Search Start Over

Low‐grade epilepsy‐associated neuroepithelial tumours with a prominent oligodendroglioma‐like component: The diagnostic challenges.

Authors :
Métais, Alice
Appay, Romain
Pagès, Mélanie
Gallardo, Catherine
Silva, Karen
Siegfried, Aurore
Perbet, Romain
Maurage, Claude‐Alain
Scavarda, Didier
Fina, Frédéric
Uro‐Coste, Emmanuelle
Riffaud, Laurent
Colin, Carole
Figarella‐Branger, Dominique
Source :
Neuropathology & Applied Neurobiology; Feb2022, Vol. 48 Issue 2, p1-15, 15p
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Aims: We searched for recurrent pathological features and molecular alterations in a retrospective series of 72 low‐grade epilepsy‐associated neuroepithelial tumours (LEATs) with a prominent oligodendroglioma‐like component, in order to classify them according to the 2021 World Health Organization (WHO) classification of central nervous system (CNS) tumours. Methods: Centralised pathological examination was performed as well as targeted molecular analysis of v‐Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homologue B (BRAF) and fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (FGFR1) by multiplexed digital polymerase chain reaction (mdPCR). DNA methylation profiling was performed in cases with sufficient DNA. In cases with no genetic alteration by mdPCR and sufficient material, RNA sequencing was done. Results: We first reclassified our cohort into three groups: ganglioglioma (GG, n = 14), dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumours (DNTs, n = 19) and glioneuronal tumours/paediatric‐type low‐grade glioma (LGG) not otherwise specified (GNT/PLGG NOS, n = 39). mdPCR found an alteration in 38/72 cases. Subsequent RNA sequencing revealed a fusion transcript involving BRAF, FGFR1/2/3 or neurotrophic tyrosine kinase receptor type 2 [NTRK2] in 9/25 cases. DNA methylation profiling found 12/46 cases with a calibrated score ≥0.9. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering revealed two clusters: Cluster 1 was enriched with cases classified as DNT at histology, belonging to the LGG–DNT methylation class (MC), with haematopoietic progenitor cell antigen (CD34) negativity and FGRF1 alterations; Cluster 2 was enriched with cases classified at histology as GG, belonging to the LGG–GG MC MC, with BRAF V600E mutation and CD34 positivity. The tumours reclassified as GNT/PLGG NOS were equally distributed across both clusters. Interestingly, all polymorphous low‐grade neuroepithelial tumour of the young belonged to Cluster 2, whereas diffuse LGG mitogen‐activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway‐altered were equally distributed among the two clusters. This led us to build an algorithm to classify LEATs with a prominent oligodendroglioma‐like component. Conclusions: Integrated histomolecular diagnosis of LEATs with a prominent oligodendroglioma‐like component remains challenging. Because these tumours can be split into two major clusters of biological significance, the clinicopathological relevance of the four types recognised by the WHO CNS5 within this spectrum of tumours is questionable. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
03051846
Volume :
48
Issue :
2
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Neuropathology & Applied Neurobiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
155029496
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/nan.12769