A systematic study on effects of calibration-waveguide geometry and least-squares formulation on ear-probe source calibrations.

Measuring ear-canal absorbance and compensating for effects of the ear-canal acoustics on otoacoustic-emission measurements using an ear probe rely on accurately determining its acoustic source parameters. Using pressure measurements made in several rigid waveguides and models of their input impedances, a conventional calibration method estimates the ear-probe Thévenin-equivalent source parameters via a least-squares fit to an over-determined system of equations. Such a calibration procedure involves critical considerations on the geometry and number of utilized calibration waveguides. This paper studies the effects of calibration-waveguide geometry on achieving accurate ear-probe calibrations and measurements by systematically varying the lengths, length ratios, radii, and number of waveguides. For calibration-waveguide lengths in the range of 10–60 mm, accurate calibrations were generally obtained with absorbance measurement errors of approximately 0.02. Longer waveguides resulted in calibration errors, mainly due to coincident resonance frequencies among waveguides in the presence of mismatches between their assumed and actual geometries. The accuracy of calibrations was independent of the calibration-waveguide radius, except for an increased sensitivity of wider waveguides to noise. Finally, it is demonstrated how reformulating the over-determined system of equations to return the least-squares reflectance source parameters substantially reduces calibration and measurement errors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]