Back to Search Start Over

H i constraints from the cross-correlation of eBOSS galaxies and Green Bank Telescope intensity maps.

Authors :
Wolz, Laura
Pourtsidou, Alkistis
Masui, Kiyoshi W
Chang, Tzu-Ching
Bautista, Julian E
Müller, Eva-Maria
Avila, Santiago
Bacon, David
Percival, Will J
Cunnington, Steven
Anderson, Chris
Chen, Xuelei
Kneib, Jean-Paul
Li, Yi-Chao
Liao, Yu-Wei
Pen, Ue-Li
Peterson, Jeffrey B
Rossi, Graziano
Schneider, Donald P
Yadav, Jaswant
Source :
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society; Mar2022, Vol. 510 Issue 3, p3495-3511, 17p
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

We present the joint analysis of Neutral Hydrogen (H  i) Intensity Mapping observations with three galaxy samples: the Luminous Red Galaxy (LRG) and Emission Line Galaxy (ELG) samples from the eBOSS survey, and the WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey sample. The H  i intensity maps are Green Bank Telescope observations of the redshifted |$21\rm cm$| emission on |$100 \, {\rm deg}^2$| covering the redshift range 0.6 < z < 1.0. We process the data by separating and removing the foregrounds present in the radio frequencies with FastI ICA. We verify the quality of the foreground separation with mock realizations, and construct a transfer function to correct for the effects of foreground removal on the H  i signal. We cross-correlate the cleaned H  i data with the galaxy samples and study the overall amplitude as well as the scale dependence of the power spectrum. We also qualitatively compare our findings with the predictions by a semianalytical galaxy evolution simulation. The cross-correlations constrain the quantity |$\Omega _{\rm {H\,\small {I}}} b_{\rm {H\,\small {I}}} r_{\rm {H\,\small {I}},{\rm opt}}$| at an effective scale k <subscript>eff</subscript>, where |$\Omega _\rm {H\,\small {I}}$| is the H   i density fraction, |$b_\rm {H\,\small {I}}$| is the H  i bias, and |$r_{\rm {H\,\small {I}},{\rm opt}}$| the galaxy–hydrogen correlation coefficient, which is dependent on the H   i content of the optical galaxy sample. At |$k_{\rm eff}=0.31 \, h\,{\rm Mpc^{-1}}$| we find |$\Omega _{\rm {H\,\small {I}}} b_{\rm {H\,\small {I}}} r_{\rm {H\,\small {I}},{\rm Wig}} = [0.58 \pm 0.09 \, {\rm (stat) \pm 0.05 \, {\rm (sys)}}] \times 10^{-3}$| for GBT-WiggleZ, |$\Omega _{\rm {H\,\small {I}}} b_{\rm {H\,\small {I}}} r_{\rm {H\,\small {I}},{\rm ELG}} = [0.40 \pm 0.09 \, {\rm (stat) \pm 0.04 \, {\rm (sys)}}] \times 10^{-3}$| for GBT-ELG, and |$\Omega _{\rm {H\,\small {I}}} b_{\rm {H\,\small {I}}} r_{\rm {H\,\small {I}},{\rm LRG}} = [0.35 \pm 0.08 \, {\rm (stat) \pm 0.03 \, {\rm (sys)}}] \times 10^{-3}$| for GBT-LRG, at z ≃ 0.8. We also report results at |$k_{\rm eff}=0.24$| and |$k_{\rm eff}=0.48 \, h\,{\rm Mpc^{-1}}$|⁠. With little information on H  i parameters beyond our local Universe, these are amongst the most precise constraints on neutral hydrogen density fluctuations in an underexplored redshift range. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00358711
Volume :
510
Issue :
3
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
154976268
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab3621