Back to Search Start Over

The cost effectiveness of personalized dietary advice to increase protein intake in older adults with lower habitual protein intake: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors :
Reinders, Ilse
Visser, Marjolein
Jyväkorpi, Satu K.
Niskanen, Riikka T.
Bosmans, Judith E.
Jornada Ben, Ângela
Brouwer, Ingeborg A.
Kuijper, Lothar D.
Olthof, Margreet R.
Pitkälä, Kaisu H.
Vijlbrief, Rachel
Suominen, Merja H.
Wijnhoven, Hanneke A. H.
Source :
European Journal of Nutrition; Feb2022, Vol. 61 Issue 1, p505-520, 16p, 1 Diagram, 5 Charts, 3 Graphs
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Purpose: To examine the cost effectiveness of dietary advice to increase protein intake on 6-month change in physical functioning among older adults. Methods: In this multicenter randomized controlled trial, 276 community-dwelling older adults with a habitual protein intake < 1.0 g/kg adjusted body weight (aBW)/d were randomly assigned to either Intervention 1; advice to increase protein intake to ≥ 1.2 g/kg aBW/d (PROT, n = 96), Intervention 2; similar advice and in addition advice to consume protein (en)rich(ed) foods within half an hour after usual physical activity (PROT + TIMING, n = 89), or continue the habitual diet with no advice (CON, n = 91). Primary outcome was 6-month change in 400-m walk time. Secondary outcomes were 6-month change in physical performance, leg extension strength, grip strength, body composition, self-reported mobility limitations and quality of life. We evaluated cost effectiveness from a societal perspective. Results: Compared to CON, a positive effect on walk time was observed for PROT; – 12.4 s (95%CI, – 21.8 to – 2.9), and for PROT + TIMING; – 4.9 s (95%CI, – 14.5 to 4.7). Leg extension strength significantly increased in PROT (+ 32.6 N (95%CI, 10.6–54.5)) and PROT + TIMING (+ 24.3 N (95%CI, 0.2–48.5)) compared to CON. No significant intervention effects were observed for the other secondary outcomes. From a societal perspective, PROT was cost effective compared to CON. Conclusion: Dietary advice to increase protein intake to ≥ 1.2 g/kg aBW/d improved 400-m walk time and leg strength among older adults with a lower habitual protein intake. From a societal perspective, PROT was considered cost-effective compared to CON. These findings support the need for re-evaluating the protein RDA of 0.8 g/kg BW/d for older adults. Trial registration: The trial has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03712306). Date of registration: October 2018. Registry name: The (Cost) Effectiveness of Increasing Protein Intake on Physical Functioning in Older Adults. Trial Identifier: NCT03712306. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14366207
Volume :
61
Issue :
1
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
European Journal of Nutrition
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
154815072
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-021-02675-0