Back to Search Start Over

Real-World Experience of Patient-Relevant Benefits and Treatment Satisfaction with Apremilast in Patients with Psoriasis: An Analysis of the APPRECIATE Study.

Authors :
Klein, Toni Maria
Blome, Christine
Kleyn, C. Elise
Conrad, Curdin
Sator, Paul G.
Ståhle, Mona
Eyerich, Kilian
Radtke, Marc Alexander
Bundy, Christine
Cordey, Myriam
Griffiths, Christopher E. M.
Augustin, Matthias
Source :
Dermatology & Therapy; Jan2022, Vol. 12 Issue 1, p81-95, 15p
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Introduction: In the real-world APPRECIATE study (NCT02740218), most patients with psoriasis demonstrated notable improvements on disease severity measures and reported clinically meaningful treatment benefits with apremilast. Objective: We aim to further describe patient-relevant needs and benefits and patient satisfaction with apremilast, including subgroup analyses based on patient characteristics. Methods: APPRECIATE, a multinational, retrospective, cross-sectional study, enrolled patients with chronic plaque psoriasis who started apremilast according to the European label. Patient Benefit Index (PBI; range 0 (no patient-relevant benefit) to 4 (maximum patient-relevant benefit), global PBI score ≥ 1 indicating minimum patient-relevant benefit and ≥ 3 indicating high benefit) and nine-item Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-9; range 0–100) were assessed 6 (± 1) months after apremilast initiation and summarized descriptively. Relationships between global PBI and TSQM-9 assessments were analyzed by Pearson correlations. Results: Of 480 enrolled patients, 347 (72.3%) had remained on apremilast at 6 (± 1) months; 90.9% (300/330) achieved global PBI score ≥ 1. Mean (standard deviation) global PBI score was 2.8 (1.2). Higher achievement of global PBI score ≥ 3 was observed in patients with no prior treatments (61.1% (22/36)) or prior phototherapy (64.6% (42/65)) versus prior conventional systemic (54.4% (100/184)) or biologic (38.6% (17/44)) treatment. Strong correlations were observed between the global PBI score and the TSQM-9 global satisfaction and effectiveness subscale scores. Conclusion: Patients continuing apremilast for 6 (± 1) months in APPRECIATE reported patient-relevant treatment benefits. Findings suggest that receiving apremilast earlier versus later in treatment management is consistent with greater improvements in patient-relevant treatment outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
21938210
Volume :
12
Issue :
1
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Dermatology & Therapy
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
154792745
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13555-021-00628-3