Back to Search Start Over

Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of endo-1,4-b-xylanase produced by Bacillus subtilis LMG S-27588 (Beltherm MP/ML) for laying hens, minor poultry species and all avian species (Puratos NV).

Authors :
Bampidis, Vasileios
Azimonti, Giovanna
de Lourdes Bastos, Maria
Christensen, Henrik
Dusemund, Birgit
Durjava, Mojca Fašmon
Kouba, Maryline
López-Alonso, Marta
López Puente, Secundino
Marcon, Francesca
Mayo, Baltasar
Pechová, Alena
Petkova, Mariana
Ramos, Fernando
Sanz, Yolanda
Villa, Roberto Edoardo
Woutersen, Ruud
Dierick, Noël
Herman, Lieve
Martelli, Giovanna
Source :
EFSA Journal; Nov2021, Vol. 19 Issue 11, p1-10, 10p
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Following a request from the European Commission, EFSA was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of an endo-1,4-b-xylanase (Beltherm MP/ML), produced by a genetically-modified Bacillus subtilis strain, as a zootechnical additive for laying hens, minor poultry species and all avian species. The additive is authorised for use in feed for poultry species for fattening or reared for laying/breeding, weaned piglets, pigs for fattening and minor porcine species for fattening. The safety and efficacy of the additive for those species have been evaluated previously by the EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP Panel). The current application is for an extension of use of the additive. No viable cells were detected in the additive, but the data provided to support the absence of DNA in the additive was not sufficient to conclude on the absence of recombinant DNA in the additive. However, the Panel concluded that no safety concerns would arise from the presence of DNA from the production strain in the additive. In the current assessment, the FEEDAP Panel concluded that the additive is safe for all avian species at the recommended level of 100 ADXU/kg feed. Similarly, the FEEDAP Panel concluded that Beltherm MP/ML is safe for the consumer and the environment. Concerning the user safety, the FEEDAP Panel concluded that the additive is not toxic by inhalation or irritant for skin or eyes, but it is considered a potential dermal and a respiratory sensitiser. In a previous opinion, the efficacy of the additive in poultry species for fattening was shown. However, owing to the insufficient data submitted in previous and current assessments, the Panel could not conclude on the efficacy of the product for the target species for which the application was made. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
18314732
Volume :
19
Issue :
11
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
EFSA Journal
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
153742751
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6906