Cite
Biodegradable Polymer DES (Ultimaster) vs. Magnesium Bioresorbable Scaffold (BRS Magmaris) in Diabetic Population with NSTE-ACS: A One-Year Clinical Outcome of Two Sirolimus-Eluting Stents.
MLA
Rola, Piotr, et al. “Biodegradable Polymer DES (Ultimaster) vs. Magnesium Bioresorbable Scaffold (BRS Magmaris) in Diabetic Population with NSTE-ACS: A One-Year Clinical Outcome of Two Sirolimus-Eluting Stents.” Journal of Diabetes Research, Nov. 2021, pp. 1–9. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8636050.
APA
Rola, P., Włodarczak, A., Barycki, M., Szudrowicz, M., Łanocha, M., Kulczycki, J. J., Turkiewicz, K., Woźnica, K., Lesiak, M., & Doroszko, A. (2021). Biodegradable Polymer DES (Ultimaster) vs. Magnesium Bioresorbable Scaffold (BRS Magmaris) in Diabetic Population with NSTE-ACS: A One-Year Clinical Outcome of Two Sirolimus-Eluting Stents. Journal of Diabetes Research, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8636050
Chicago
Rola, Piotr, Adrian Włodarczak, Mateusz Barycki, Marek Szudrowicz, Magdalena Łanocha, Jan Jakub Kulczycki, Karol Turkiewicz, Katarzyna Woźnica, Maciej Lesiak, and Adrian Doroszko. 2021. “Biodegradable Polymer DES (Ultimaster) vs. Magnesium Bioresorbable Scaffold (BRS Magmaris) in Diabetic Population with NSTE-ACS: A One-Year Clinical Outcome of Two Sirolimus-Eluting Stents.” Journal of Diabetes Research, November, 1–9. doi:10.1155/2021/8636050.