Back to Search Start Over

Antibiotic prophylaxis for prevention against Lyme disease following tick bite: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors :
Zhou, Guozhong
Xu, Xin
Zhang, Yu
Yue, Peng
Luo, Shiqi
Fan, Yuxin
Chen, Jingjing
Liu, Meixiao
Dong, Yan
Li, Bingxue
Kong, Jing
Wen, Shiyuan
Liu, Aihua
Bao, Fukai
Source :
BMC Infectious Diseases; 11/8/2021, Vol. 21 Issue 1, p1-8, 8p
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

<bold>Background: </bold>In areas where Lyme disease is endemic, bites from ticks are common, but no vaccine is currently available against Lyme disease for humans. Therefore, the feasibility of using antibiotic prophylaxis to prevent Lyme disease after a tick bite is worth further exploration. Previous meta-analyses lack sufficient power to demonstrate the efficacy of about antibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention of Lyme disease following a tick bite. In this study, we explored more precise evidence and attempted to identify and update optimum treatment strategies.<bold>Methods: </bold>We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for studies until March 23, 2021. We included studies if the enrolled patients were randomly allocated to a treatment or control group within 72 h following a tick bite and had no clinical evidence of Lyme disease at enrolment. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines were followed for data abstraction. Two authors (GZZ and XX) independently reviewed the abstracts and identified articles for detailed assessment. We used a random-effects model to calculate the pooled results and reported the 95% confidence interval (CI). Study quality was assessed using a modified Jadad scale, and publication bias was assessed using Egger's test. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) for the rates of unfavorable events in patients who received intervention versus the control group. This study is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42021245002.<bold>Results: </bold>Six studies (3,766 individuals) were included. The pooled rate of unfavorable events in persons receiving treatment and the control group were 0.4% (95%CI: 0.1-1.1%) and 2.2% (95%CI: 1.6-3.0%), respectively. The pooled RR was 0.38 (95%CI: 0.22-0.66). Subgroup analysis revealed that the pooled RR was 0.29 (95%CI: 0.14-0.60) in the single-use 200-mg doxycycline group; 0.28 (95%CI: 0.05-1.67) in a 10-day course group (Amoxicillin, Penicillin or tetracycline); and 0.73 (95%CI: 0.25-2.08) in a topical antibiotic treatment group (Azithromycin).<bold>Conclusions: </bold>The available evidence supports the use of antibiotics for the prevention of Lyme disease, and reveals advantages of using single-dose; however, further confirmation is needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14712334
Volume :
21
Issue :
1
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
BMC Infectious Diseases
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
153454588
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-021-06837-7