Back to Search
Start Over
Comparison of intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and laparoscopic common bile duct exploration combined with laparoscopic cholecystectomy for treating gallstones and common bile duct stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
- Source :
- Surgical Endoscopy & Other Interventional Techniques; Nov2021, Vol. 35 Issue 11, p5918-5935, 18p
- Publication Year :
- 2021
-
Abstract
- <bold>Background: </bold>This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (LC-IntraERCP) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy combined with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LC-LCBDE) to determine which one-stage therapeutic strategy provides better outcomes for patients with gallstones and common bile duct stones.<bold>Methods: </bold>Cochrane Library, EMBASE, PubMed, and Web of Science databases were searched to identify eligible articles from the database inception to September 2020. The revised Cochrane risk of bias tools for randomized trials (RoB-2) and non-randomized interventions (ROBINS-I) was used to assess the quality of the included studies. The overall quality of evidence was assessed through the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) tool. The primary outcomes consisted of surgical success, retained stones, and overall postoperative complications, while secondary outcomes included postoperative bleeding, postoperative pancreatitis, postoperative bile leakage, conversion to laparotomy, and operative time.<bold>Results: </bold>Eight studies (four RCTs and four Non-RCTs with high quality) with 2948 patients were included. No significant difference was seen between the two groups regarding surgical success, overall postoperative complications, conversion to laparotomy, and operative time. The meta-analysis demonstrated that in the LC-IntraERCP group, the rate of retained stones (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.28-0.91) and postoperative bile leakage were lower (OR 0.25, 95% CI 0.09-0.69), while in the LC-LCBDE group, postoperative bleeding (OR 5.24, 95% CI 1.65-16.65) and postoperative pancreatitis (OR 4.80, 95% CI 2.35-9.78) decreased.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>LC-IntraERCP and LC-LCBDE exhibited similar efficacies when surgical success rate, overall postoperative complications, conversion to laparotomy, and operative time were compared. However, LC-IntraERCP is probably to be more effective in terms of lowering the rate of retained stones. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Subjects :
- LAPAROSCOPIC common bile duct exploration
GALLSTONES
ENDOSCOPIC retrograde cholangiopancreatography
GALLBLADDER
SURGICAL complications
CHOLECYSTECTOMY
ONLINE information services
META-analysis
MEDICAL databases
INFORMATION storage & retrieval systems
MEDICAL information storage & retrieval systems
SYSTEMATIC reviews
LAPAROSCOPIC surgery
ENDOSCOPIC gastrointestinal surgery
BILE ducts
MEDLINE
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 18666817
- Volume :
- 35
- Issue :
- 11
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- Surgical Endoscopy & Other Interventional Techniques
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 153081634
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08648-y