Back to Search
Start Over
Droit naturel et droit à la vie. Beccaria lecteur de Hobbes.
- Source :
- Diciottesimo Secolo: Rivista della Società Italiana di Studi sul Secolo XVIII; 2019, Vol. 4, p33-45, 13p
- Publication Year :
- 2019
-
Abstract
- Although in the section A chi legge he suggested otherwise, Beccaria owes much to Hobbes. Tis is evinced by three theses advanced in Dei delitti e delle pene: human beings are by nature unsociable; there is no natural law prior to the establishment of the civil society; natural rights derive from our inborn tendency to self-preservation. From these assumptions, however, Beccaria draws three conclusions that contradict Hobbes: even the most fundamental rights, being guaranteed only by the civil law, are in fact created by it; sovereignty, which is intrinsically limited, is legitimate only insofar as it acknowledges the right to live; the death penalty is illegitimate because it brings men back to the state of permanent war they meant to overcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Details
- Language :
- Italian
- ISSN :
- 25314165
- Volume :
- 4
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- Diciottesimo Secolo: Rivista della Società Italiana di Studi sul Secolo XVIII
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 153075117
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.13128/ds-25436