Discordance in the diagnostic assessment of vulnerable plaques between radiofrequency intravascular ultrasound versus optical coherence tomography among patients with acute myocardial infarction: insights from the IBIS-4 study.

MLA

Ueki, Yasushi, et al. “Discordance in the Diagnostic Assessment of Vulnerable Plaques between Radiofrequency Intravascular Ultrasound versus Optical Coherence Tomography among Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction: Insights from the IBIS-4 Study.” International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, vol. 37, no. 10, Oct. 2021, pp. 2839–47. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-021-02272-6.

APA

Ueki, Y., Yamaji, K., Losdat, S., Karagiannis, A., Taniwaki, M., Roffi, M., Otsuka, T., Koskinas, K. C., Holmvang, L., Maldonado, R., Pedrazzini, G., Radu, M. D., Dijkstra, J., Windecker, S., Garcia-Garcia, H. M., & Räber, L. (2021). Discordance in the diagnostic assessment of vulnerable plaques between radiofrequency intravascular ultrasound versus optical coherence tomography among patients with acute myocardial infarction: insights from the IBIS-4 study. International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, 37(10), 2839–2847. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-021-02272-6

Chicago

Ueki, Yasushi, Kyohei Yamaji, Sylvain Losdat, Alexios Karagiannis, Masanori Taniwaki, Marco Roffi, Tatsuhiko Otsuka, et al. 2021. “Discordance in the Diagnostic Assessment of Vulnerable Plaques between Radiofrequency Intravascular Ultrasound versus Optical Coherence Tomography among Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction: Insights from the IBIS-4 Study.” International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 37 (10): 2839–47. doi:10.1007/s10554-021-02272-6.