Back to Search Start Over

A novel score for evaluating cerebral aneurysms treated with flow diversion: 4F-flow diversion predictive score.

Authors :
Kang, Huibin
Luo, Bin
Liu, Jian
Wang, Anxin
Zhang, Hongqi
Li, Tianxiao
Song, Donglei
Zhao, Yuanli
Guan, Sheng
Wang, Yunyan
Feng, Wenfeng
Wang, Yang
Shi, Huaizhang
Liu, Jianmin
Yang, Xinjian
Source :
Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders; 8/19/2021, p1-13, 13p
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Background and purpose: Although grading scales for angiography outcomes following cerebral aneurysm treatment with flow diversion have been published, physicians have not widely adopted these scales in practice. The aim of this study is to propose and validate a novel Flow diversion Predictive Score (4F-FPS) grading scale based on previously established scales that is simple and reliable. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients who underwent endovascular treatment for cerebral aneurysms with flow diversion between January 2014 and September 2019. The included patients were randomly divided into the derivation and validation group in a 70/30 ratio, respectively. Aneurysms were classified as incomplete or complete occlusion based on final angiography outcomes. 4F-FPS was derived to predict aneurysm occlusion from multivariate logistic regression analyses in the derivation group and validated with previously published grading scales in the validation group. Results: Overall, 662 patients [mean age, 53.8 years; 72.5% (480/662) female] with 662 aneurysms treated with the Pipeline<superscript>TM</superscript> flow diverter were included [69.9% (463/662) derivation group, 30.1% (199/662) validation group]. The incidence of aneurysm occlusion was 82.7%. 4F-FPS demonstrated significant discrimination in 10-fold cross validation [mean receiver operating characteristic (ROC) area, 0.862 ± 0.055] and calibration (Cox & Snell R <superscript>2</superscript>, 0.251; Nagelkerke R <superscript>2</superscript>, 0.413) in the derivation group. The ROC area of 4F-FPS score in both the derivation and validation groups is the largest compared with previously published grading scales/scores (p < 0.05), which shows better sensitivity and specificity. The 4F-FPS score showed excellent prediction, discrimination, and calibration properties. Conclusion: The 4F-FPS score is a simple and reliable tool to predict angiography outcome after flow diversion treatment. If widely adopted, it may provide a common language to be used in future reporting of flow diversion results for clinical trials and daily practice. Clinical trial registration: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT03831672 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
17562856
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
152023833
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1177/17562864211039336