Back to Search Start Over

Safety and efficacy of faecal microbiota transplantation for active peripheral psoriatic arthritis: an exploratory randomised placebo-controlled trial.

Authors :
Kragsnaes, Maja Skov
Kjeldsen, Jens
Horn, Hans Christian
Munk, Heidi Lausten
Pedersen, Jens Kristian
Just, Søren Andreas
Ahlquist, Palle
Pedersen, Finn Moeller
de Wit, Maarten
Möller, Sören
Andersen, Vibeke
Kristiansen, Karsten
Holm, Dorte Kinggaard
Holt, Hanne Marie
Christensen, Robin
Ellingsen, Torkell
Kinggaard Holm, Dorte
Source :
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases; Sep2021, Vol. 80 Issue 9, p1158-1167, 80p
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

<bold>Objectives: </bold>Although causality remains to be established, targeting dysbiosis of the intestinal microbiota by faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) has been proposed as a novel treatment for inflammatory diseases. In this exploratory, proof-of-concept study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of FMT in psoriatic arthritis (PsA).<bold>Methods: </bold>In this double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, superiority trial, we randomly allocated (1:1) adults with active peripheral PsA (≥3 swollen joints) despite ongoing treatment with methotrexate to one gastroscopic-guided FMT or sham transplantation into the duodenum. Safety was monitored throughout the trial. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of participants experiencing treatment failure (ie, needing treatment intensification) through 26 weeks. Key secondary endpoints were change in Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) and American College of Rheumatology (ACR20) response at week 26.<bold>Results: </bold>Of 97 screened, 31 (32%) underwent randomisation (15 allocated to FMT) and 30 (97%) completed the 26-week clinical evaluation. No serious adverse events were observed. Treatment failure occurred more frequently in the FMT group than in the sham group (9 (60%) vs 3 (19%); risk ratio, 3.20; 95% CI 1.06 to 9.62; p=0.018). Improvement in HAQ-DI differed between groups (0.07 vs 0.30) by 0.23 points (95% CI 0.02 to 0.44; p=0.031) in favour of sham. There was no difference in the proportion of ACR20 responders between groups (7 of 15 (47%) vs 8 of 16 (50%)).<bold>Conclusions: </bold>In this first preliminary, interventional randomised controlled trial of FMT in immune-mediated arthritis, we did not observe any serious adverse events. Overall, FMT appeared to be inferior to sham in treating active peripheral PsA.<bold>Trial Registration Number: </bold>NCT03058900. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00034967
Volume :
80
Issue :
9
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
151924348
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-219511