Back to Search Start Over

Randomised study within a trial (SWAT) to evaluate personalised versus standard text message prompts for increasing trial participant response to postal questionnaires (PROMPTS).

Authors :
Cureton, Lucy
Marian, Ioana R.
Barber, Vicki S.
Parker, Adwoa
Torgerson, David J.
Hopewell, Sally
Source :
Trials; 7/28/2021, Vol. 22 Issue 1, p1-10, 10p, 3 Diagrams, 5 Charts, 2 Graphs
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

<bold>Background: </bold>Use of a person's name in a text message has been shown to be effective in instigating behaviour change. We evaluated the effectiveness of a personalised text message (including the recipient's name) versus a standardised text message for prompting a response from trial participants to complete and return postal follow-up questionnaires.<bold>Methods: </bold>Using a randomised study within a trial (SWAT) embedded within the host GRASP (Getting it Right: Addressing Shoulder Pain) trial, participants who provided a mobile telephone number were randomised (1:1) by a central computer system to receive either (1) a personalised text message which included their name or (2) a standard text message. Text messages were sent by the trial office on the same day as the 6-month GRASP follow-up questionnaire. The primary outcome was questionnaire response rate, defined as the proportion of 6-month GRASP follow-up questionnaires returned by participants. Secondary outcomes included time to response, the proportion of participants sent a reminder follow-up questionnaire, and cost.<bold>Results: </bold>Between March 2017 and May 2019 (recruitment period for GRASP trial), 618 participants were randomised to a personalised (n = 309) or standard (n = 309) text message and all were included in the analysis. The overall questionnaire response rate was 87% (n = 537/618); 90% (n = 277/309) of participants responded in the personalised text message group compared to 84% (n = 260/309) in the standard text message group (relative risk (RR) 1.07; 95% CI 1.00 to 1.13). Participants randomised to receive the personalised text message were more likely to return their initial postal questionnaire than those who received the standard text message (n = 185/309; 60% vs. n = 160/309; 52%) (RR 1.16; 95% CI 1.00 to 1.33); this represents an absolute percentage difference between intervention groups of 8%. Post hoc subgroup analysis showed that males under 65 years were the group most likely to return their initial questionnaire if they received a personalised text message.<bold>Conclusion: </bold>Overall, participants who received a personalised text message were more likely to return their questionnaire than those who received the standard text message.<bold>Trial Registration: </bold>GRASP Trial ISRCTN16539266 ; SWAT Repository ID 35. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
17456215
Volume :
22
Issue :
1
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Trials
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
151647848
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05452-w