Benchmarking microbiome transformations favors experimental quantitative approaches to address compositionality and sampling depth biases.

While metagenomic sequencing has become the tool of preference to study host-associated microbial communities, downstream analyses and clinical interpretation of microbiome data remains challenging due to the sparsity and compositionality of sequence matrices. Here, we evaluate both computational and experimental approaches proposed to mitigate the impact of these outstanding issues. Generating fecal metagenomes drawn from simulated microbial communities, we benchmark the performance of thirteen commonly used analytical approaches in terms of diversity estimation, identification of taxon-taxon associations, and assessment of taxon-metadata correlations under the challenge of varying microbial ecosystem loads. We find quantitative approaches including experimental procedures to incorporate microbial load variation in downstream analyses to perform significantly better than computational strategies designed to mitigate data compositionality and sparsity, not only improving the identification of true positive associations, but also reducing false positive detection. When analyzing simulated scenarios of low microbial load dysbiosis as observed in inflammatory pathologies, quantitative methods correcting for sampling depth show higher precision compared to uncorrected scaling. Overall, our findings advocate for a wider adoption of experimental quantitative approaches in microbiome research, yet also suggest preferred transformations for specific cases where determination of microbial load of samples is not feasible. Here, the authors use simulated quantitative gut microbial communities to benchmark the performance of 13 common data transformations in determining diversity as well as microbe-microbe and microbe-metadata associations, finding that quantitative approaches incorporating microbial load variation outperform computational strategies in downstream analyses, urging for a widespread adoption of quantitative approaches, or recommending specific computational transformations whenever determination of microbial load of samples is not feasible. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]