Back to Search Start Over

Impact of treating iron deficiency, diagnosed according to hepcidin quantification, on outcomes after a prolonged ICU stay compared to standard care: a multicenter, randomized, single-blinded trial.

Authors :
Lasocki, Sigismond
Asfar, Pierre
Jaber, Samir
Ferrandiere, Martine
Kerforne, Thomas
Asehnoune, Karim
Montravers, Philippe
Seguin, Philippe
Peoc'h, Katell
Gergaud, Soizic
Nagot, Nicolas
Lefebvre, Thibaud
Lehmann, Sylvain
the Hepcidane study group
Beloncle, François
Mercat, Alain
Gaillard, Thomas
Leger, Maxime
Rineau, Emmanuel
Sargentini, Cyril
Source :
Critical Care; 6/1/2021, Vol. 25 Issue 1, p1-10, 10p
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Background: Anemia is a significant problem in patients on ICU. Its commonest cause, iron deficiency (ID), is difficult to diagnose in the context of inflammation. Hepcidin is a new marker of ID. We aimed to assess whether hepcidin levels would accurately guide treatment of ID in critically ill anemic patients after a prolonged ICU stay and affect the post-ICU outcomes. Methods: In a controlled, single-blinded, multicenter study, anemic (WHO definition) critically ill patients with an ICU stay ≥ 5 days were randomized when discharge was expected to either intervention by hepcidin treatment protocol or control. In the intervention arm, patients were treated with intravenous iron (1 g of ferric carboxymaltose) when hepcidin was < 20 μg/l and with intravenous iron and erythropoietin for 20 ≤ hepcidin < 41 μg/l. Control patients were treated according to standard care (hepcidin quantification remained blinded). Primary endpoint was the number of days spent in hospital 90 days after ICU discharge (post-ICU LOS). Secondary endpoints were day 15 anemia, day 30 fatigue, day 90 mortality and 1-year survival. Results: Of 405 randomized patients, 399 were analyzed (201 in intervention and 198 in control arm). A total of 220 patients (55%) had ID at discharge (i.e., a hepcidin < 41 μg/l). Primary endpoint was not different (medians (IQR) post-ICU LOS 33(13;90) vs. 33(11;90) days for intervention and control, respectively, median difference − 1(− 3;1) days, p = 0.78). D90 mortality was significantly lower in intervention arm (16(8%) vs 33(16.6%) deaths, absolute risk difference − 8.7 (− 15.1 to − 2.3)%, p = 0.008, OR 95% IC, 0.46, 0.22–0.94, p = 0.035), and one-year survival was improved (p = 0.04). Conclusion: Treatment of ID diagnosed according to hepcidin levels did not reduce the post-ICU LOS, but was associated with a significant reduction in D90 mortality and with improved 1-year survival in critically ill patients about to be discharged after a prolonged stay. Trial registration: www.clinicaltrial.gov NCT02276690 (October 28, 2014; retrospectively registered) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
13648535
Volume :
25
Issue :
1
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Critical Care
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
150610664
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-03430-3