A comparative study of dentinal tubule penetration and the retreatability of EndoSequence BC Sealer HiFlow, iRoot SP, and AH Plus with different obturation techniques.

MLA

Yang, Ruiqi, et al. “A Comparative Study of Dentinal Tubule Penetration and the Retreatability of EndoSequence BC Sealer HiFlow, IRoot SP, and AH Plus with Different Obturation Techniques.” Clinical Oral Investigations, vol. 25, no. 6, June 2021, pp. 4163–73. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03747-x.

APA

Yang, R., Tian, J., Huang, X., Lei, S., Cai, Y., Xu, Z., & Wei, X. (2021). A comparative study of dentinal tubule penetration and the retreatability of EndoSequence BC Sealer HiFlow, iRoot SP, and AH Plus with different obturation techniques. Clinical Oral Investigations, 25(6), 4163–4173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03747-x

Chicago

Yang, Ruiqi, Jun Tian, Xiangya Huang, Shuxiang Lei, Yanling Cai, Zhezhen Xu, and Xi Wei. 2021. “A Comparative Study of Dentinal Tubule Penetration and the Retreatability of EndoSequence BC Sealer HiFlow, IRoot SP, and AH Plus with Different Obturation Techniques.” Clinical Oral Investigations 25 (6): 4163–73. doi:10.1007/s00784-020-03747-x.