Back to Search Start Over

Photodegradation of sulfonamides in UV/ozone, UV/oxidant, and UV/ ozone/oxidant systems: comparison in terms of mineralization efficiency and power consumption.

Authors :
An-Min Wang
Chung-Hsin Wu
Syuan-Ru Jhu
Cheng-Di Dong
Chiu-Wen Chen
Yi-Li Lin
Guan-Yu Su
Yi-Ting Tsai
Source :
Desalination & Water Treatment; 4/30/2021, Vol. 220, p255-264, 10p
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

UV/O<subscript>3</subscript>, UV/H<subscript>2</subscript>O<subscript>2</subscript>, UV/Na<subscript>2</subscript>S<subscript>2</subscript>O<subscript>8</subscript>, UV/O3/H<subscript>2</subscript>O<subscript>2</subscript>, and UV/UV/Na<subscript>2</subscript>S<subscript>2</subscript>O<subscript>8</subscript> systems were used to mineralize sulfamethoxazole (SMX) and sulfathiazole (STZ). The effects of pH and salinity on sulfonamide mineralization were determined. The mineralization of sulfonamides exhibited pseudo-firstorder kinetics. At pH 5, the pseudo-first-order rate constants (k) of SMX in the UV/O<subscript>3</subscript>, UV/H<subscript>2</subscript>O<subscript>2</subscript>, UV/Na<subscript>2</subscript>S<subscript>2</subscript>O<subscript>8</subscript>, UV/O<subscript>3</subscript>/H<subscript>2</subscript>O<subscript>2</subscript>, and UV/O<subscript>3</subscript>/Na<subscript>2</subscript>S<subscript>2</subscript>O<subscript>8</subscript> systems were 0.0193, 0.0011, 0.0022, 0.0172, and 0.0925 min<superscript>-1</superscript>, respectively, and those of STZ were 0.0238, 0.0011, 0.0031, 0.0201, and 0.0536 min<superscript>-1</superscript>, respectively. At pH 5, adding Na2S2O8 to the UV/O3 system promoted sulfonamide mineralization, whereas adding H<subscript>2</subscript>O<subscript>2</subscript>to the UV/O<subscript>3</subscript> system inhibited it. At pH 9, adding Na<subscript>2</subscript>S<subscript>2</subscript>O<subscript>8</subscript> or H<subscript>2</subscript>O<subscript>2</subscript> to the UV/ O<subscript>3</subscript> system promoted sulfonamide mineralization. The highest efficiency of mineralization for both SMX and STZ was achieved using the UV/O<subscript>3</subscript>/Na<subscript>2</subscript>S<subscript>2</subscript>O<subscript>8</subscript> system and the efficiency followed the order pH 5 > pH 7 > pH 9. In the UV/O<subscript>3</subscript>/Na<subscript>2</subscript>S<subscript>2</subscript>O<subscript>8</subscript> system at pH 9, adding 0.62 mM salinity reduced the k value of SMX from 0.0224 to 0.0181 min<superscript>-1</superscript> and that of STZ from 0.0322 to 0.0233 min<superscript>-1</superscript> . In the UV/O<subscript>3</subscript>/ H<subscript>2</subscript>O<subscript>2</subscript> system at pH 9, adding 0.62 mM salinity reduced the k value of SMX from 0.0137 to 0.0065 min<superscript>-1</superscript> and that of STZ from 0.0159 to 0.0072 min<superscript>-1</superscript> . The figure-of-merit electrical energy per order was used to estimate the electrical energy efficiencies of the systems. At pH 5, the UV/O<subscript>3</subscript>/Na<subscript>2</subscript>S<subscript>2</subscript>O<subscript>8</subscript> system exhibited the highest energy efficiency for SMX mineralization whereas the UV/Na<subscript>2</subscript>S<subscript>2</subscript>O<subscript>8</subscript>system did so for STZ mineralization. The highest energy efficiency system varied with the parent compound. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
19443994
Volume :
220
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Desalination & Water Treatment
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
150139030
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2021.26924