Back to Search Start Over

Blinatumomab as first salvage versus second or later salvage in adults with relapsed/refractory B‐cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Results of a pooled analysis.

Authors :
Topp, Max S.
Stein, Anthony S.
Gökbuget, Nicola
Horst, Heinz‐August
Boissel, Nicolas
Martinelli, Giovanni
Kantarjian, Hagop
Brüggemann, Monika
Chen, Yuqi
Zugmaier, Gerhard
Source :
Cancer Medicine; Apr2021, Vol. 10 Issue 8, p2601-2610, 10p
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Background: Blinatumomab is a BiTE® immuno‐oncology therapy indicated for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory (r/r) B‐cell precursor (BCP) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Aims: To assess the efficacy and safety of blinatumomab as first salvage versus second or later salvage in patients with r/r BCP ALL. Materials & Methods: Patient‐level pooled data were used for this analysis. In total, 532 adults with r/r BCP ALL treated with blinatumomab were included (first salvage, n = 165; second or later salvage, n = 367). Results: Compared with patients who received blinatumomab as second or later salvage, those who received blinatumomab as first salvage had a longer median overall survival (OS; 10.4 vs. 5.7 months; HR, 1.58; 95% CI, 1.26–1.97; P <.001) and relapse‐free survival (10.1 vs. 7.3 months; HR, 1.38; 95% CI, 0.98–1.93; P =.061), and higher rates of remission (n = 89 [54%] vs. n = 150 [41%]; odds ratio, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.41–0.85; P =.005), minimal residual disease response (n = 68 [41%] vs. n = 118 [32%]), and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (alloHSCT) realization (n = 60 [36%] vs. n = 88 [24%]), and alloHSCT in continuous remission (n = 33 [20%] vs. n = 52 (14%]). In a subgroup analysis, there was no apparent effect of prior alloHSCT on median OS in either salvage group. The safety profile of blinatumomab was generally similar between the groups; however, cytokine release syndrome, febrile neutropenia, and infection were more frequent with second or later salvage than with first salvage. Discussion: In this pooled analysis, the logistic regression analyses indicated greater benefit with blinatumomab as first salvage than as second or later salvage, as evident by the longer median OS, longer median RFS, and higher rates of remission. Conclusion: Overall, blinatumomab was beneficial as first salvage and as second or later salvage, but the effects were favorable as first salvage. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
20457634
Volume :
10
Issue :
8
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Cancer Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
149707175
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3731