Back to Search Start Over

Auto-Regulation Method vs. Fixed-Loading Method in Maximum Strength Training for Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors :
Zhang, Xing
Li, Hansen
Bi, Shilin
Luo, Yong
Cao, Yang
Zhang, Guodong
Source :
Frontiers in Physiology; 3/12/2021, Vol. 11, pN.PAG-N.PAG, 13p
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

The auto-regulation method is a rising training strategy to improve strength and motor performance, and the Autoregulatory Progressive Resistance Exercise (APRE), Rating of Perceived Exertion program (RPE), and Velocity-Based Training (VBT) are the three common auto-regulation programs. However, whether the auto-regulation method is more effective than the traditional strength training (the fixed-loading method) in maximum strength training is still unclear. The present study searched the Pubmed, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science, Embase, EBSCO, Cochrane, CNKI, and CQVIP databases, and included eight related studies published between 2010 and 2020, with a total of 166 subjects including division 1 college players and athletes with at least 1-year training history, and interventions ranging from 5 to 10 weeks. A meta-analysis was performed to check the difference between the two training methods, and analyzed the differences in the existing auto-regulation programs' effectiveness. The overall results showed that the auto-regulation method was more effective than the fixed-loading method in maximum strength training (effect size = 0.64; P < 0.001; I <superscript>2</superscript> = 0%). In specific, the pooled results in subgroup analysis indicated that the auto-regulation method may effectively improve the strength performance in squat (effect size = 4.64; P < 0.05; I <superscript>2</superscript> = 54%) and bench press (effect size = 3.21; P < 0.05; I <superscript>2</superscript> = 62%). Greater benefits of the auto-regulation method on strength improvement could be achieved in an 8-week or even shorter training (effect size = 0.87; P < 0.001; I <superscript>2</superscript> = 0%) compared with those of 8–10 weeks (effect size = 0.32; P < 0.001; I <superscript>2</superscript> = 0%). The APRE is the most effective training program among the three auto-regulation programs (effect size = 0.78; P < 0.001; I <superscript>2</superscript> = 0%). In conclusion, the auto-regulation method could be more effective than the fixed-loading method in maximum strength training. The APRE is a convenient and effective training program that may be considered a practical training program to replace traditional training in athletes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1664042X
Volume :
11
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Frontiers in Physiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
149265029
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2021.651112