Back to Search
Start Over
Elucidating the natural–synthetic mismatch of Pb2+Te4+O3: The redefinition of fairbankite to Pb122+(Te4+O3)11(SO4)
- Source :
- American Mineralogist; Feb2021, Vol. 106 Issue 2, p309-316, 8p
- Publication Year :
- 2021
-
Abstract
- For four decades fairbankite was reported to have the formula Pb<superscript>2+</superscript>(Te<superscript>4+</superscript>O<subscript>3</subscript>), but repeated attempts to isolate fairbankite crystals for structural determination found only the visually similar cerussite and, more rarely, anglesite. The crystal-structure determination of fairbankite using single-crystal X-ray diffraction, supported by electron microprobe analysis and X-ray powder diffraction on the type specimen, has shown that fairbankite contains essential S, along with Pb, Te, and O. The chemical formula of fairbankite has been revised to Pb<subscript>12</subscript><superscript>2+</superscript>(Te<superscript>4+</superscript>O<subscript>3</subscript>)<subscript>11</subscript>(SO<subscript>4</subscript>). This change has been accepted by the IMA–CNMNC, Proposal 19-I. The crystal structure of fairbankite [space group P1 (no. 1); revised cell: a = 7.0205(3) Å, b = 10.6828(6) Å, c = 14.4916(8) Å, a = 75.161(5)°, b = 81.571(4)°, g = 83.744(4)°, V = 1036.35(9) Å<superscript>3</superscript>, and Z = 1] is the first atomic arrangement known to contain a Te<subscript>3</subscript><superscript>4+</superscript>O<subscript>6</subscript><superscript>6−</superscript> non-cyclic, finite building unit. Fairbankite has an average structure, formed from a 3D framework of Pb<superscript>2+</superscript>O<subscript>n</subscript> polyhedra, Te<superscript>4+</superscript>O<subscript>n</subscript> polyhedra, and SO<subscript>4</subscript> tetrahedra in a 12:11:1 ratio. The stereoactive lone pairs of the Pb<superscript>2+</superscript> and Te<superscript>4+</superscript> cations are oriented into void space within the structure. Fairbankite contains two mixed sites statistically occupied by Te<superscript>4+</superscript> and S<superscript>6+</superscript> in approximately 4:1 and 1:4 ratios. These two sites possess Te<superscript>4+</superscript> in trigonal-pyramidal environment and S<superscript>6+</superscript> in tetrahedral environment (with an additional O site to create tetrahedral SO<subscript>4</subscript> shape for the S-dominant site). Six of the 10 fully occupied Te<superscript>4+</superscript> sites have Te<superscript>4+</superscript> in trigonal-pyramidal environment, while four have Te<superscript>4+</superscript> at the center of highly distorted Te<superscript>4+</superscript>O<subscript>4</subscript> disphenoids. The disphenoids allow for the creation of two dimeric Te<subscript>2</subscript><superscript>4+</superscript> O<subscript>6</subscript><superscript>4−</superscript> units in addition to the Te<subscript>3</subscript><superscript>4+</superscript>O<subscript>6</subscript><superscript>6−</superscript> trimeric unit, which contains two disphenoids. All linkage between disphenoids and trigonal pyramids is via corner-linking. Secondary connectivity is via long Te–O and Pb–O bonds. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 0003004X
- Volume :
- 106
- Issue :
- 2
- Database :
- Complementary Index
- Journal :
- American Mineralogist
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 148540928
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.2138/am-2020-7536