Back to Search Start Over

Developing a whole-school mental health and wellbeing intervention through pragmatic formative process evaluation: a case-study of innovative local practice within The School Health Research network.

Authors :
Gobat, Nina
Littlecott, Hannah
Williams, Andy
McEwan, Kirsten
Stanton, Helen
Robling, Michael
Rollnick, Stephen
Murphy, Simon
Evans, Rhiannon
Source :
BMC Public Health; 1/18/2021, Vol. 21 Issue 1, p1-16, 16p, 1 Diagram, 5 Charts
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

<bold>Background: </bold>The evidence-base for whole school approaches aimed at improving student mental health and wellbeing remains limited. This may be due to a focus on developing and evaluating de-novo, research-led interventions, while neglecting the potential of local, contextually-relevant innovation that has demonstrated acceptability and feasibility. This study reports a novel approach to modelling and refining the programme theory of a whole-school restorative approach, alongside plans to scale up through a national educational infrastructure in order to support robust scientific evaluation.<bold>Methods: </bold>A pragmatic formative process evaluation was conducted of a routinized whole-school restorative approach aimed at improving student mental health and wellbeing in Wales.<bold>Results: </bold>The study reports the six phases of the pragmatic formative process evaluation. These are: 1) identification of innovative local practice; 2) scoping review of evidence-base to identify potential programme theory; outcomes; and contextual characteristics that influence implementation; 3) establishment of a Transdisciplinary Action Research (TDAR) group; 4) co-production and confirmation of an initial programme theory with stakeholders; 5) planning to optimise intervention delivery in local contexts; and 6) planning for feasibility and outcome evaluation. The phases of this model may be iterative and not necessarily sequential.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>Formative, pragmatic process evaluations can support researchers, policy-makers and practitioners in developing robust scientific evidence-bases for acceptable and feasible local innovations that do not already have a clear evidence base. The case of a whole-school restorative approach provides a case example of how such an evaluation may be undertaken. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14712458
Volume :
21
Issue :
1
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
BMC Public Health
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
148163167
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-10124-6