ОХОРОНА КУЛЬТУРНОЇ СПАДЩИНИ НА ОКУПОВАНИХ ТЕРИТОРІЯХ УКРАЇНИ.

The issues of cultural heritage protection on the occupied territories of Ukraine came to agenda immediately after the annexation of Crimea and at the beginning of the armed conflict in Eastern Ukraine. The Law of Ukraine ‘On Ensuring the Rights and Freedoms of Citizens and the Legal Regime in the Temporarily Occupied Territory of Ukraine’, adopted in April 2014, was the first act dealing with this issue. Since 2014, no systematic approach to the relevant state policy has been introduced. The current situation, with the freezing of the conflict, may contribute to the strengthening of nonmilitary forms of confrontation with the aggressor. Hence, the protection of the cultural heritage of Ukraine, remaining under occupation, is gradually becoming one of the main fronts of the hybrid war. That is why the urgency of legal analysis of cultural heritage protection in the occupied territories is becoming more called-for. The outlined legal issue is discussed primarily in the monument protection area, rather than in the academic legal community. In that way, the purpose of this article is to bring this issue to the attention of lawyers, to highlight the author’s experience in this field and to make suggestions for improving legal mechanisms for national protection, which came under temporary control and in the area of interest of Russia as an aggressor state. The analysis of the available data shows that Ukraine is taking specific steps to defend its position on the protection of cultural heritage in the occupied territories and to respond to the relevant encroachments by the aggressor. At the same time, even in the seventh year of the war, these steps still lack coherence and political coordination. It is crucial to create legal preconditions to solve these challenges. The legislative definition of the legal regime of temporary occupation of the territories of the Crimea and Donbas region (as well as the responsibilities of the occupier for the protection of the cultural heritage of Ukraine) needs joint legal regulation. In addition to strengthening work at the international level with the use of new mechanisms and the proper use of the potential of ratified documents, the continuation and improvement of sanctions policy, Ukraine needs to coordinate the monitoring of cultural heritage sites in the occupied territories, utilizing modern remote sensing technologies. These steps will allow a radical increment in the penal proceeding numbers for the crimes of the occupiers, which will be the basis for the development of the Ukrainian offensive on this front. The issue of regulating the monitoring functions of the cultural heritage protection bodies needs to be resolved at the legislative level. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]