Lymecycline vs. clindamycin plus rifampicin in hidradenitis suppurativa treatment: clinical and ultrasonography evaluation.

Background: Antibiotic therapy remains the first‐line treatment for hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). However, literature data on its comparative clinical efficacy and safety are limited. Aim: To investigate the efficacy of tetracycline (lymecycline 300 mg daily) vs. the combination therapy clindamycin and rifampicin (600 mg plus 600 mg daily) by evaluating and comparing the clinical response at the end of antibiotic treatment (10 weeks). Methods: The study retrospectively analysed 52 patients divided in two groups of 26 patients: Group A received lymecycline and Group B received clindamycin plus rifampicin for 10 weeks. Subjects had mild, moderate and severe HS. The clinical and ultrasonography extent of disease was measured by the Hurley Score, Sonographic Score of Hidradenitis Suppurativa, International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4), pain visual analogue scale (pain VAS) and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). The primary outcome was the clinical response at the end of the antibiotic treatment period, according to the Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response measure. Results: Both groups showed a significant improvement in IHS4, pain VAS and DLQI from baseline, but this was more marked in Group A. Reductions in nodule counts were similar between the two groups, whereas the number of abscesses and draining tunnels decreased more in Group B. Disease‐free survival was similar between the two groups. Conclusion: Lymecycline monotherapy and clindamycin plus rifampicin combination are both effective treatments for patients with moderate–severe HS. Nodular‐type HS seems to respond better to lymecycline, whereas the abscess/tunnel type seems to respond better to clindamycin plus rifampicin. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]