Perceptions of allied health staff of the implementation of an integrated electronic medical record across regional and metropolitan settings.

Objective. The aim of this study was to investigate the perceptions of allied health professionals (AHPs) to implementation of an integrated electronic medical record (EMR) across both regional and metropolitan settings. Methods. The study was conducted as a cross-sectional electronic survey. AHPs working at three hospital sites within Queensland Health were sent an electronic survey link. Participation was voluntary and recruitment via a snowball sampling technique was encouraged. Responses were analysed descriptively. Results. In all, 104 responders completed the survey. Responders were distributed across three sites within the selected health service, with most (75%; n = 78) being at the largest site. Physiotherapy accounted for the largest number of responders (22%). Most responders were female (87%; n=90) and between 20 and 40 years of age (68%; n=71). On a scale from 0 (being anxious) to 100 (being excited), at the time EMR implementation was announced, there was a trend towards excitement (mean score 59). The most commonly reported factor hindering EMR implementation was the opportunity to practice with EMR (34%), whereas clinical 'change champions' were reported as the most common facilitators (61%). Overall, 60% of responders were very satisfied or satisfied with the EMR, but limited effects on efficiency and patient care were reported. Conclusions. The results suggest an overall positive response to EMR implementation. Minimal staff reported effects such as stress or anxiety in the workplace related to EMR implementation, and a perception of 'comfort' was cited onceEMRwas part of usual practice. However, responders did not report a significant effect on speed, efficiency or quality of patient care following EMR implementation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]