Medial olivocochlear efferent reflex in humans: otoacoustic emission (OAE) measurement issues and the advantages of stimulus frequency OAEs.

Otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) are useful for studying medial olivocochlear (MOC) efferents, but several unresolved methodological issues cloud the interpretation of the data they produce. Most efferent assays use a ‘probe stimulus’ to produce an OAE and an ‘elicitor stimulus’ to evoke efferent activity and thereby change the OAE. However, little attention has been given to whether the probe stimulus itself elicits efferent activity. In addition, most studies use only contralateral (re the probe) elicitors and do not include measurements to rule out middle-ear muscle (MEM) contractions. Here we describe methods to deal with these problems and present a new efferent assay based on stimulus frequency OAEs (SFOAEs) that incorporates these methods. By using a postelicitor window, we make measurements in individual subjects of efferent effects from contralateral, ipsi-lateral, and bilateral elicitors. Using our SFOAE assay, we demonstrate that commonly used probe sounds (clicks, tone pips, and tone pairs) elicit efferent activity, by themselves. Thus, results of efferent assays using these probe stimuli can be confounded by unwanted efferent activation. In contrast, the single 40 dB SPL tone used as the probe sound for SFOAE- based measurements evoked little or no efferent activity. Since they evoke efferent activation, clicks, tone pips, and tone pairs can be used in an adaptation efferent assay, but such paradigms are limited in measurement scope compared to paradigms that separate probe and elicitor stimuli. Finally, we describe tests to distinguish middle-ear muscle (MEM) effects from MOC effects for a number of OAE assays and show results from SFOAE-based tests. The SFOAE assay used in this study provides a sensitive, flexible, frequency-specific assay of medial efferent activation that uses a low-level probe sound that elicits little or no efferent activity, and thus provides results that can be interpreted without the confound of unintended efferent activation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]