Back to Search Start Over

Stability of SARS-CoV-2 phylogenies.

Authors :
Turakhia, Yatish
De Maio, Nicola
Thornlow, Bryan
Gozashti, Landen
Lanfear, Robert
Walker, Conor R.
Hinrichs, Angie S.
Fernandes, Jason D.
Borges, Rui
Slodkowicz, Greg
Weilguny, Lukas
Haussler, David
Goldman, Nick
Corbett-Detig, Russell
Source :
PLoS Genetics; 11/18/2020, Vol. 16 Issue 11, p1-34, 34p
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has led to unprecedented, nearly real-time genetic tracing due to the rapid community sequencing response. Researchers immediately leveraged these data to infer the evolutionary relationships among viral samples and to study key biological questions, including whether host viral genome editing and recombination are features of SARS-CoV-2 evolution. This global sequencing effort is inherently decentralized and must rely on data collected by many labs using a wide variety of molecular and bioinformatic techniques. There is thus a strong possibility that systematic errors associated with lab—or protocol—specific practices affect some sequences in the repositories. We find that some recurrent mutations in reported SARS-CoV-2 genome sequences have been observed predominantly or exclusively by single labs, co-localize with commonly used primer binding sites and are more likely to affect the protein-coding sequences than other similarly recurrent mutations. We show that their inclusion can affect phylogenetic inference on scales relevant to local lineage tracing, and make it appear as though there has been an excess of recurrent mutation or recombination among viral lineages. We suggest how samples can be screened and problematic variants removed, and we plan to regularly inform the scientific community with our updated results as more SARS-CoV-2 genome sequences are shared (https://virological.org/t/issues-with-sars-cov-2-sequencing-data/473 and https://virological.org/t/masking-strategies-for-sars-cov-2-alignments/480). We also develop tools for comparing and visualizing differences among very large phylogenies and we show that consistent clade- and tree-based comparisons can be made between phylogenies produced by different groups. These will facilitate evolutionary inferences and comparisons among phylogenies produced for a wide array of purposes. Building on the SARS-CoV-2 Genome Browser at UCSC, we present a toolkit to compare, analyze and combine SARS-CoV-2 phylogenies, find and remove potential sequencing errors and establish a widely shared, stable clade structure for a more accurate scientific inference and discourse. Author summary: SARS-CoV-2 genome sequences have been produced by hundreds of labs across the world. Idiosyncratic data generation or processing has the potential to inject non-random errors into genome sequences provided by individual lab groups. Here we show that these sites can be detected and removed by identifying variants that appear to reoccur many times across a phylogeny and are associated with specific lab groups. We show that the identified variants are consistent with expectations for recurrent error. These sites may produce spurious signatures of natural selection and viral recombination. We also provide methods for comparisons and visualization of extremely large phylogenies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
15537390
Volume :
16
Issue :
11
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
PLoS Genetics
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
147075213
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1009175