An empirical comparison of three methods for multiple cutoff diagnostic test meta‐analysis of the Patient Health Questionnaire‐9 (PHQ‐9) depression screening tool using published data vs individual level data.

MLA

Benedetti, Andrea, et al. “An Empirical Comparison of Three Methods for Multiple Cutoff Diagnostic Test Meta‐analysis of the Patient Health Questionnaire‐9 (PHQ‐9) Depression Screening Tool Using Published Data vs Individual Level Data.” Research Synthesis Methods, vol. 11, no. 6, Nov. 2020, pp. 833–48. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1443.

APA

Benedetti, A., Levis, B., Rücker, G., Jones, H. E., Schumacher, M., Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Thombs, B. (2020). An empirical comparison of three methods for multiple cutoff diagnostic test meta‐analysis of the Patient Health Questionnaire‐9 (PHQ‐9) depression screening tool using published data vs individual level data. Research Synthesis Methods, 11(6), 833–848. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1443

Chicago

Benedetti, Andrea, Brooke Levis, Gerta Rücker, Hayley E. Jones, Martin Schumacher, John P. A. Ioannidis, and Brett Thombs. 2020. “An Empirical Comparison of Three Methods for Multiple Cutoff Diagnostic Test Meta‐analysis of the Patient Health Questionnaire‐9 (PHQ‐9) Depression Screening Tool Using Published Data vs Individual Level Data.” Research Synthesis Methods 11 (6): 833–48. doi:10.1002/jrsm.1443.