Comparison of Support Vector Machine, Naïve Bayes and Logistic Regression for Assessing the Necessity for Coronary Angiography.

MLA

Golpour, Parastoo, et al. “Comparison of Support Vector Machine, Naïve Bayes and Logistic Regression for Assessing the Necessity for Coronary Angiography.” International Journal of Environmental Research & Public Health, vol. 17, no. 18, Sept. 2020, p. 6449. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186449.

APA

Golpour, P., Ghayour-Mobarhan, M., Saki, A., Esmaily, H., Taghipour, A., Tajfard, M., Ghazizadeh, H., Moohebati, M., & Ferns, G. A. (2020). Comparison of Support Vector Machine, Naïve Bayes and Logistic Regression for Assessing the Necessity for Coronary Angiography. International Journal of Environmental Research & Public Health, 17(18), 6449. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186449

Chicago

Golpour, Parastoo, Majid Ghayour-Mobarhan, Azadeh Saki, Habibollah Esmaily, Ali Taghipour, Mohammad Tajfard, Hamideh Ghazizadeh, Mohsen Moohebati, and Gordon A. Ferns. 2020. “Comparison of Support Vector Machine, Naïve Bayes and Logistic Regression for Assessing the Necessity for Coronary Angiography.” International Journal of Environmental Research & Public Health 17 (18): 6449. doi:10.3390/ijerph17186449.