Back to Search Start Over

Atmospheric conditions and composition that influence PM2.5 oxidative potential in Beijing, China.

Authors :
Campbell, Steven J.
Wolfer, Kate
Utinger, Battist
Westwood, Joe
Zhi-hui Zhang
Bukiowiecki, Nicolas
Steimer, Sarah S.
Vu, Tuan V.
Jingsha Xu
Straw, Nicholas
Thomson, Steven
Elzein, Atallah
Sun, Yele
Di Liu
Linjie Li
Pingqing Fu
Lewis, Alastair C.
Harrison, Roy M.
Bloss, William J.
Loh, Miranda
Source :
Atmospheric Chemistry & Physics Discussions; 10/13/2020, p1-40, 40p
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Epidemiological studies have consistently linked exposure to PM<subscript>2.5</subscript> with adverse health effects. The oxidative potential (OP) of aerosol particles has been widely suggested as a measure of their potential toxicity. Several acellular chemical assays are now readily employed to measure OP, however, uncertainty remains regarding the atmospheric conditions and specific chemical components of PM<subscript>2.5</subscript> that drive OP. A limited number of studies have simultaneously utilised multiple OP assays with a wide range of concurrent measurements and investigated the seasonality of PM<subscript>2.5</subscript> OP. In this work, filter samples were collected in winter 2016 and summer 2017 during the atmospheric pollution and human health in a Chinese megacity (APHH-Beijing) campaign, and PM<subscript>2.5</subscript> OP was analysed using four acellular methods; ascorbic acid (AA), dithiothreitol (DTT), 2-7-dichlorofluoroscin/hydrogen peroxidase (DCFH) and electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy (EPR). Positive correlations of OP normalised per volume of air of all four assays with overall PM<subscript>2.5</subscript> mass was observed, with stronger correlations in the winter compared to the summer. In contrast, when OP assay values were normalised for particle mass, days with higher PM<subscript>2.5</subscript> mass concentrations (μg m<superscript>-3</superscript>) were found to have lower intrinsic mass-normalised OP values as measured by AA and DTT. This indicates that total PM<subscript>2.5</subscript> mass concentrations alone might not always be the best indicator for particle toxicity. Univariate analysis of OP values and an extensive range of additional measurements, 107 in total, including PM<subscript>2.5</subscript> composition, gas phase composition and meteorological data, provides detailed insight into chemical components or atmospheric processes that determine PM<subscript>2.5</subscript> OP variability. Multivariate statistical analyses highlighted associations of OP assay responses with varying chemical components in PM<subscript>2.5</subscript> for both mass- and volume-normalised data. Variable selection was used to produce subsets of measurements indicative of PM<subscript>2.5</subscript> sources, and used to model OP response; AA and DTT assays were well predicted by small panels of measurements, and indicated fossil fuel combustion processes, vehicle emissions and biogenic SOA as most influential in the assay response. Through comparative analysis of both mass- and volume-normalised data we demonstrate the importance of also considering mass-normalised OP when correlating with particle composition measurements, which provides a more nuanced picture of compositional drivers and sources of OP compared to volume-normalised analysis, and which may be more useful in temporal and site comparative contexts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
16807367
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Atmospheric Chemistry & Physics Discussions
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
146412533
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-2020-1024