Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of spontaneous fetal loss rates between women with singleton and twin pregnancies after mid-trimester amniocentesis - A historical cohort study.

Authors :
Chen, Jiawei
Liu, Linhu
Xia, Dan
He, Fenghua
Wang, Qiyi
Li, Ting
Lai, Yi
Liu, Shanling
Zhang, Zhu
Source :
Prenatal Diagnosis; Sep2020, Vol. 40 Issue 10, p1315-1320, 6p
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

<bold>Objective: </bold>To assess and compare fetal loss rates before 28 weeks of singleton and twin pregnancies after mid-trimester amniocentesis.<bold>Method: </bold>This historic cohort study included 13 773 women with singletons and 426 women with twins undergoing mid-trimester amniocentesis from 1/2015 to 3/2017. Pregnancies resulting in termination or selective reduction before 28 weeks were excluded, as well as twin gestations undergoing single-puncture amniocentesis. Fetal loss rates were compared between singleton and twins taking into account maternal characteristics, amniocentesis procedure, and fetal chromosomal abnormalities.<bold>Results: </bold>The rates of fetal chromosomal abnormalities were similar in singleton and twin gestations (1.13% vs 0.70%, P = .253). No difference was found in maternal or fetal characteristics, or amniocentesis procedure between the two groups. The fetal loss rate was significantly higher in twin compared with singleton pregnancies (1.91% vs 0.24%, P < .001, RR = 8.25 [95% CI: 4.51 to 15.09]). The fetal loss rate between monochorionic twins and dichorionic twins was similar (1.80% vs 1.78%, P = 1.000).<bold>Conclusions: </bold>Twin pregnancies have higher risk of fetal loss after mid-trimester amniocentesis, which cannot be explained by differences in rates of fetal chromosomal abnormalities, maternal characteristic, or amniocentesis technique. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
01973851
Volume :
40
Issue :
10
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Prenatal Diagnosis
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
146026377
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.5774