Back to Search Start Over

Is There Necessity for Oversewing the Staple Line During Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy? An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors :
Wu, Chang
Wang, Fu-Gang
Yan, Wen-Mao
Yan, Ming
Song, Mao-Min
Source :
Journal of Investigative Surgery; Oct2020, Vol. 33 Issue 9, p839-850, 12p
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has become the current mainstream surgical treatment for obesity. With the development of clinical practice, surgeons realized the associated severity and danger of postoperative bleeding and leakage. Surgeons constantly explore different strategies to reduce the incidence of these complications. By reviewing previous clinical articles on the staple line reinforcement (SLR) in LSG, the conclusions were inconsistent regarding effectiveness. This article aims to discuss effectiveness of oversewing the staple line in LSG. Methods: From the start date of each database to September 27, 2018, a comprehensive search of published articles in English was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Central (Cochrane) databases and Scopus databases. We extracted and analyzed the main results on postoperative bleeding, staple line leakage, hospital stay and operative time of the final included articles. This review was compliant with PRISMA guidelines. Results: Finally, we extracted and analyzed 11 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which contain 2411 patients (1219 patients as part of the oversewing (OS) group and 1192 patients in the no-oversewing (NOS) group). In the OS group, there were 15 cases (1.23%) of postoperative bleeding, and 8 cases (0.66%) of postoperative leakage. While in the NOS group, 35 patients (2.94%) had postoperative bleeding and 21 patients (1.76%) had postoperative leakage. By comparing and analyzing the OS group and the NOS group, the risk ratio (RR) for postoperative bleeding was 0.48 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.27–0.83 p = 0.447). In addition, the RR for postoperative leakage was 0.44 (95% CI, 0.21–0.89 p = 0.835). The standardized mean difference (SMD) for hospital stay was −0.10 (95% CI, −0.25 to 0.04 p = 0.061) and 2.26 for operative time (95%CI, 0.82–3.69 p = 0.000). Conclusion: This study suggested that oversewing the staple line during LSG has a significant clinical value: it decreased the incidence of postoperative bleeding, postoperative leakage; moreover, it also significantly prolonged the operative time and but did not change hospital stay. More high-quality and large sample RCTs are expected to get more accurate results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
08941939
Volume :
33
Issue :
9
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Journal of Investigative Surgery
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
145497396
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2019.1665380