Back to Search Start Over

Binding of [18F]AV1451 in post mortem brain slices of semantic variant primary progressive aphasia patients.

Authors :
Schaeverbeke, Jolien
Celen, Sofie
Cornelis, Julie
Ronisz, Alicja
Serdons, Kim
Van Laere, Koen
Thal, Dietmar Rudolf
Tousseyn, Thomas
Bormans, Guy
Vandenberghe, Rik
Source :
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine & Molecular Imaging; Jul2020, Vol. 47 Issue 8, p1949-1960, 12p, 1 Color Photograph, 1 Chart, 1 Graph
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Purpose: In vivo tau-PET tracer retention in the anterior temporal lobe of patients with semantic variant primary progressive aphasia (SV PPA) has consistently been reported. This is unexpected as the majority of these patients have frontotemporal lobar degeneration TDP (FTLD-TDP). Methods: We conducted an in vitro [<superscript>18</superscript>F]AV1451 autoradiography binding study in five cases with a clinical diagnosis of SV PPA constituting the range of pathologies (i.e., three FTLD-TDP, one Alzheimer's disease (AD), and one Pick's disease (PiD)). Binding was compared with two controls without neurodegeneration, two typical AD, one corticobasal syndrome with underlying AD, and one frontotemporal dementia behavioral variant with FTLD-TDP. The effect of blocking with the authentic reference material and with the MAO-B inhibitor deprenyl was assessed. Immunohistochemistry was performed on adjacent cryosections. Results: Absence of specific [<superscript>18</superscript>F]AV1451 binding was observed for all three SV PPA FTLD-TDP cases. The absence of binding in controls as well as the successful blocking with authentic AV1451 in cases with tauopathy demonstrated specificity of the [<superscript>18</superscript>F]AV1451 signal for tau. The specific [<superscript>18</superscript>F]AV1451 binding was highest in AD, followed by PiD. This binding colocalized with the respective tau lesions and could not be blocked by deprenyl. Similar pilot findings were obtained with [<superscript>18</superscript>F]THK5351. Conclusion: In vitro autoradiography showed no [<superscript>18</superscript>F]AV1451 binding in SV PPA due to FTLD-TDP, while specific binding was present in SV PPA due to AD and PiD. The discrepancy between in vitro and in vivo findings remains to be explained. The discordance is not related to [<superscript>18</superscript>F]AV1451 idiosyncrasies as [<superscript>18</superscript>F]THK5351 findings were similar. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
16197070
Volume :
47
Issue :
8
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine & Molecular Imaging
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
144800953
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-019-04631-x