Back to Search Start Over

Systematic comparison of single-cell and single-nucleus RNA-sequencing methods.

Authors :
Ding, Jiarui
Adiconis, Xian
Simmons, Sean K.
Kowalczyk, Monika S.
Hession, Cynthia C.
Marjanovic, Nemanja D.
Hughes, Travis K.
Wadsworth, Marc H.
Burks, Tyler
Nguyen, Lan T.
Kwon, John Y. H.
Barak, Boaz
Ge, William
Kedaigle, Amanda J.
Carroll, Shaina
Li, Shuqiang
Hacohen, Nir
Rozenblatt-Rosen, Orit
Shalek, Alex K.
Villani, Alexandra-Chloé
Source :
Nature Biotechnology; Jun2020, Vol. 38 Issue 6, p737-746, 10p, 3 Color Photographs, 3 Diagrams, 10 Graphs
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

The scale and capabilities of single-cell RNA-sequencing methods have expanded rapidly in recent years, enabling major discoveries and large-scale cell mapping efforts. However, these methods have not been systematically and comprehensively benchmarked. Here, we directly compare seven methods for single-cell and/or single-nucleus profiling—selecting representative methods based on their usage and our expertise and resources to prepare libraries—including two low-throughput and five high-throughput methods. We tested the methods on three types of samples: cell lines, peripheral blood mononuclear cells and brain tissue, generating 36 libraries in six separate experiments in a single center. To directly compare the methods and avoid processing differences introduced by the existing pipelines, we developed scumi, a flexible computational pipeline that can be used with any single-cell RNA-sequencing method. We evaluated the methods for both basic performance, such as the structure and alignment of reads, sensitivity and extent of multiplets, and for their ability to recover known biological information in the samples. Seven methods for single-cell RNA sequencing are benchmarked on cell lines, primary cells and mouse cortex. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
10870156
Volume :
38
Issue :
6
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Nature Biotechnology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
143676895
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41587-020-0465-8