Back to Search Start Over

Percutaneous mastoid electrical stimulator improves Poststroke depression and cognitive function in patients with Ischaemic stroke: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, and sham-controlled study.

Authors :
Lu, Taoli
He, Lanying
Zhang, Bei
Wang, Jian
Zhang, Lili
Dong, Wei Wei
Yang, Hao
Source :
BMC Neurology; 5/29/2020, Vol. 20 Issue 1, p1-9, 9p, 2 Diagrams, 4 Charts
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

<bold>Background: </bold>Poststroke depression can lead to functional dependence, cognitive impairment and reduced quality of life. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of a percutaneous mastoid electrical stimulator (PMES) plus antidepressants on poststroke depression and cognitive function.<bold>Methods: </bold>This study was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, and sham-controlled study. A total of 258 clinically depressed ischaemic stroke patients within 14 days of index stroke were randomly assigned to the PMES plus antidepressant (PMES group, N = 125) and sham plus antidepressant (sham group, N = 133) groups. All patients underwent the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) test at 2 weeks (baseline), and 6 months(M6) after ischaemic stroke. Primary outcomes were the percentage of patients showing a treatment response (≥50% reduction in HRSD score) and depression remission (HRSD score ≤ 9) at 6 months. The secondary outcome was the percentage of patients with a MoCA score < 26.<bold>Results: </bold>The percentages of patients showing a treatment response and depression remission were significantly higher in the PMES group than in the sham group (57.60% vs 41.35%, P = 0.009; 44.00% vs 29.32%, P = 0.014 respectively). The mean value of the HRSD score change [M (month)6-baseline] was significantly higher in the PMES group than in the sham group at 6 months (- 11.93 ± 5.32 vs - 10.48 ± 6.10, P = 0.036, respectively). The percentage of patients with MoCA scores < 26 was lower in the PEMS group than in the sham group (12.0% vs 24.06%, P = 0.012,respectively), and the mean value of the MoCA score change (M6-baseline) was higher in the PMES group than in the sham group (3.50 ± 2.55 vs 2.72 ± 2.52, P = 0.005, respectively).<bold>Conclusion: </bold>These findings demonstrate that PMES adjunctive to antidepressant therapy is effective in reducing depression, achieving remission in the short term, and improving cognition.<bold>Trial Registration: </bold>This trial was retrospectively registered (registration number: ChiCTR1800016463) on 03 June 2018. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14712377
Volume :
20
Issue :
1
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
BMC Neurology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
143491912
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-020-01795-0