Back to Search Start Over

The impacts of uncertainties in emissions on aerosol data assimilation and short-term PM2.5 predictions in CMAQ v5.2.1 over East Asia.

Authors :
Sojin Lee
Chul Han Song
Kyung Man Han
Henze, Daven K.
Kyunghwa Lee
Jinhyeok Yu
Jung-Hun Woo
Jia Jung
Yunsoo Choi
Saide, Pablo E.
Carmichael, Gregory R.
Source :
Geoscientific Model Development Discussions; 5/15/2020, p1-31, 31p
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

For the purpose of improving PM prediction skills in East Asia, we estimated a new background error covariance matrix (BEC) for aerosol data assimilation using surface PM<subscript>2.5</subscript> observations that accounts for the uncertainties in anthropogenic emissions. In contrast to the conventional method to estimate the BEC that uses perturbations in meteorological data, this method additionally considered the perturbations using two different emission inventories. The impacts of the new BEC were then tested for the prediction of surface PM<subscript>2.5</subscript> over East Asia using Community Multi-scale Air Quality (CMAQ) initialized by three-dimensional variational method (3D-VAR). The surface PM<subscript>2.5</subscript> data measured at 154 sites in South Korea and 1,535 sites in China were assimilated every six hours during the Korea-United States Air Quality Study (KORUS-AQ) campaign period (1 May-14 June 2016). Data assimilation with our new BEC showed better agreement with the surface PM<subscript>2.5</subscript> observations than that with the conventional method. Our method also showed closer agreement with the observations in 24-hour PM<subscript>2.5</subscript> predictions with ~ 44 % fewer negative biases than the conventional method. We conclude that increased standard deviations, together with horizontal and vertical length scales in the new BEC, tend to improve the data assimilation and short-term predictions for the surface PM<subscript>2.5</subscript>. This paper also suggests further research efforts devoted to estimating the BEC to improve PM<subscript>2.5</subscript> predictions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
19919611
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Geoscientific Model Development Discussions
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
143216817
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-2020-116